Skip to Search Skip to Left Navigation U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) - Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) - United States Department of Transportation (USDOT, US DOT or DOT)
  ABOUT RITA | CONTACT US | PRESS ROOM | CAREERS | SITE MAP
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
Data and Statistics
Bookstore
Programs
About BTS
Upcoming Press Releases
External Links
Intelligent Transportation Systems
National Transportation Library
Research, Development and Technology
Transportation Safety Institute
University Transportation Centers
Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
Printable Version
[From the House Reports Online via GPO Access.
Check for accuracy before quoting or citing.]


104th Congress Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 104-286 _______________________________________________________________________ MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND RELATED AGENCIES, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES _______ October 20, 1995.--Ordered to be printed _______________________________________________________________________ Mr. Wolf, from the committee of conference, submitted the following CONFERENCE REPORT [To accompany H.R. 2002] The committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the amendments of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 2002) ``making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes,'' having met, after full and free conference, have agreed to recommend and do recommend to their respective Houses as follows: That the Senate recede from its amendments numbered 2, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 21, 34, 37, 44, 51, 53, 56, 63, 64, 65, 66, 73, 78, 86, 91, 112, 121, 125, 126, 132, 133, 134, 135, 141, 142, 143, 146, 148, 152, 155, 156, 161, 162, 165, 166, 171, 172, 173, 181, 183, 184, 185, 189, and 190. That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendments of the Senate numbered 3, 4, 15, 17, 20, 24, 31, 33, 35, 38, 39, 42, 43, 46, 49, 50, 69, 70, 71, 74, 76, 77, 79, 84, 85, 89, 90, 93, 99, 105, 107, 108, 114, 119, 120, 136, 138, 144, 145, 147, 149, 150, 151, 159, 160, 168, 169, 170, and 191, and agree to the same. Amendment numbered 1: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 1, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $56,189,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 6: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 6, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $8,220,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 7: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 7, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $103,149,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 8: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 8, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $22,600,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 9: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 9, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $22,600,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 14: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 14, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $16,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 16: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 16, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $135,200,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 22: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 22, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $2,278,991,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 23: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 23, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: ; and of which $20,000,000 shall be expended from the Boat Safety Account; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 25: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 25, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $362,375,000; and on page 8 of the House engrossed bill H.R. 2002 delete line 23; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 26: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 26, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $167,600,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 27: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 27, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $12,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 28: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 28, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $49,200,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 29: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 29, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $88,875,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 30: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 30, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $44,700,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 32: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 32, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: : Provided further, That the Commandant may dispose of surplus real property by sale or lease and the proceeds of such sale or lease shall be credited to this appropriation; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 36: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 36, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $18,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 40: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 40, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $4,645,712,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 41: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 41, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $2,222,859,100; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 45: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 45, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: : Provided further, That the Secretary may transfer funds to this account, from Coast Guard ``Operating expenses'', not to exceed $60,000,000 in total for the fiscal year, fifteen days after written notification to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, solely for the purpose of providing additional funds for air traffic control operations and maintenance to enhance aviation safety and security; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 47: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 47, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $1,934,883,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 48: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 48, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $1,718,883,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 52: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 52, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $185,698,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 54: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 54, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $1,450,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 55: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 55, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the first sum named in said amendment, insert: $26,000,000. In lieu of the second sum named in said amendment, insert: $48,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 57: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 57, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $509,660,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 58: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 58, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $208,946,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 59: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 59, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $11,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 60: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 60, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $11,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 61: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 61, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $17,550,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 62: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 62, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $77,225,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 67: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 67, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $51,884,430; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 68: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 68, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $32,247,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 72: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 72, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $127,700,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 75: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 75, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: : Provided further, That none of these funds shall be used for construction, rehabilitation or remodeling costs, or for office furnishings and fixtures for State, local, or private buildings or structures; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 80: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 80, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $49,919,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 81: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 81, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $24,550,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 82: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 82, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $115,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 83: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 83, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter stricken and inserted by said amendment, insert: studies, corridor planning, development, demonstration, and implementation, $19,205,000, to remain available until expended; and on page 24, line 14 of the House engrossed bill H.R. 2002, delete ``$5,000,000'' and in lieu thereof, insert: $7,118,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 87: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 87, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the first sum named in said amendment, insert: $1,000,000; and in lieu of the second sum named in said amendment, insert: $6,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 88: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 88, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter stricken and inserted by said amendment, insert: $635,000,000, to remain available until expended; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 92: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 92, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: That up to $15,000,000 of the amount made available under this head for capital improvements may, at the discretion of the Corporation, be transferred to the Northeast Corridor Improvement Program: Provided further, ; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 94: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 94, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $942,925,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 95: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 95, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $2,052,925,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 96: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 96, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: : Provided further, That the limitation on operating assistance provided under this heading shall, for urbanized areas of less than 200,000 in population, be no less than seventy-five percent of the amount of operating assistance such areas are eligible to receive under Public Law 103-331; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 97: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 97, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: : Provided further, That in the distribution of the limitation provided under this heading to urbanized areas that had a population under the 1990 census of 1,000,000 or more, the Secretary shall direct each such area to give priority consideration to the impact of reductions in operating assistance on smaller transit authorities operating within the area and to consider the needs and resources of such transit authorities when the limitation is distributed among all transit authorities operating in the area; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 98: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 98, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter stricken and inserted by said amendment, insert: $85,500,000 of which $39,500,000 shall be for activities under 49 U.S.C. 5303, $4,500,000 for activities under 49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(2), $8,250,000 for activities under 49 U.S.C. 5313(b), $22,000,000 for activities under 49 U.S.C. 5314, $8,250,000 for activities under 49 U.S.C. 5313(a), and $3,000,000 for activities under 49 U.S.C. 5315; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 100: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 100, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter stricken and inserted by said amendment, insert: , notwithstanding any other provision of law, except for fixed guideway modernization projects, $21,631,250 made available under Public Law 102-388 under ``Federal Transit Administration, Discretionary Grants'' for projects specified in that Act or identified in reports accompanying that Act, not obligated by September 30, 1995, shall be made available for new fixed guideway systems together with the $666,000,000 made available for new fixed guideway systems in this Act, to be available as follows; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 101: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 101, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $20,060,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 102: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 102, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: $4,250,000 for the Canton-Akron-Cleveland commuter rail project; ; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 103: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 103, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: $1,000,000 for the Cincinnati Northeast/ Northern Kentucky rail line project; ; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 104: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 104, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $3,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 106: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 106, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $6,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 109: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 109, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: $9,720,625 for the Jacksonville ASE extension project; ; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 110: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 110, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $85,000,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 111: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 111, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: $8,500,000 for the Los Angeles-San Diego commuter rail project; ; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 113: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 113, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $15,315,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 115: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 115, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: $1,250,000 for the Memphis, Tennessee Regional Rail Plan; ; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 116: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 116, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $80,250,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 117: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 117, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: $5,000,000 for the New Orleans Canal Street Corridor project; ; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 118: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 118, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $126,725,125; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 122: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 122, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $12,500,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 123: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 123, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $9,759,500; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 124: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 124, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: , of which not more than $5,000,000 may be available for high-occupancy vehicle lane and intermodal corridor design costs; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 127: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 127, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: $7,500,000 for the San Juan, Puerto Rico Tren Urbano project; And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 128: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 128, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: $500,000 for the Tampa to Lakeland commuter rail project; And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 129: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 129, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: $2,500,000 for the Whitehall ferry terminal, New York, New York; And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 130: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 130, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: ; and; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 131: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 131, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: $5,650,000 for the Burlington-Charlotte, Vermont commuter rail project. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 137: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 137, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $23,937,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 139: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 139, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $31,448,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 140: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 140, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $28,750,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 153: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 153, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $7,500,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 154: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 154, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the sum proposed by said amendment, insert: $95,649,000; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 157: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 157, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter stricken and inserted by said amendment, insert: collocate and consolidate; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 158: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 158, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter stricken and inserted by said amendment, insert: surface transportation field offices and administrative activities; and the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 163: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 163, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert the following: Sec. 339. None of the funds in this Act shall, in the absence of express authorization by Congress, be used directly or indirectly to pay for any personal service, advertisement, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter, or other device, intended or designed to influence in any manner a Member of Congress, to favor or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legislation or appropriation by Congress, whether before or after the introduction of any bill or resolution proposing such legislation or appropriation: Provided, That this shall not prevent officers or employees of the Department of Transportation or related agencies funded in this Act from communicating to Members of Congress on the request of any Member or to Congress, through the proper official channels, requests for legislation or appropriations which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public business. And, on page 53 of the House engrossed bill H.R. 2002, delete lines 1-13. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 164: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 164, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: Restore the matter stricken by said amendment, amended to read as follows: Sec. 340. None of the funds in this Act shall be available to pay the salaries and expenses of any individual to arrange tours of scientists or engineers employed by or working for the People's Republic of China, to hire citizens of the People's Republic of China to participate in research fellowships sponsored by the modal administrations of the Department of Transportation, or to provide training or any form of technology transfer to scientists or engineers employed by or working for the People's Republic of China: Provided, That this provision shall not apply to the Federal Aviation Administration or the joint Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Defense and Department of Commerce initiative designed to modernize the air traffic control system of the People's Republic of China. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 167: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 167, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: Sec. 343. None of the funds made available in this Act may be used for improvements to the Miller Highway in New York City, New York. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 174: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 174, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: Sec. 347. (a) In consultation with the employees of the Federal Aviation Administration and such non-governmental experts in personnel management systems as he may employ, and notwithstanding the provisions of title 5, United States Code, and other Federal personnel laws, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall develop and implement, not later than January 1, 1996, a personnel management system for the Federal Aviation Administration that addresses the unique demands on the agency's workforce. Such a new system shall, at a minimum, provide for greater flexibility in the hiring, training, compensation, and location of personnel. (b) The provisions of title 5, United States Code, shall not apply to the new personnel management system developed and implemented pursuant to subsection (a), with the exception of: (1) Section 2302(b), relating to whistleblower protection; (2) Sections 3308-3320, relating to veterans' preference; (3) Section 7116(b)(7), relating to limitations on the right to strike; (4) Section 7204, relating to antidiscrimination; (5) Chapter 73, relating to suitability, security, and conduct; (6) Chapter 81, relating to compensation for work injury; and (7) Chapters 83-85, 87, and 89, relating to retirement, unemployment compensation, and insurance coverage. (c) This section shall take effect on April 1, 1996. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 175: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 175, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: Sec. 348. (a) In consultation with such non-governmental experts in acquisition management systems as he may employ, and notwithstanding provisions of Federal acquisition law, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall develop and implement, not later than January 1, 1996, an acquisition management system for the Federal Aviation Administration that addresses the unique needs of the agency and, at a minimum, provides for more timely and cost-effective acquisitions of equipment and materials. (b) The following provisions of Federal acquisition law shall not apply to the new acquisition management system developed and implemented pursuant to subsection (a): (1) Title III of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 252- 266). (2) The Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 et seq.); (3) The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-355); (4) The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.), except that all reasonable opportunities to be awarded contracts shall be provided to small business concerns and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged inidividuals; (5) The Competition in Contracting Act; (6) Subchapter V of Chapter 35 of title 31, relating to the procurement protest system; (7) The Brooks Automatic Data Processing Act (40 U.S.C. 759); and (8) The Federal Acquisition Regulation and any laws not listed in (a) through (e) of this section providing authority to promulgate regulations in the Federal Acquisition Regulation. (c) This section shall take effect on April 1, 1996. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 176: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 176, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the section designation of said amendment, insert: Sec. 349. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 177: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 177, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the section designation of said amendment, insert: Sec. 350. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 178: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 178, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the section designation of said amendment, insert: Sec. 351. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 179: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 179, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the section designation of said amendment, insert: Sec. 352. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 180: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 180, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the section designation of said amendment, insert: Sec. 353. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 182: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 182, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the section designation of said amendment, insert: Sec. 354. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 186: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 186, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the section designation of said amendment, insert: Sec. 355. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 187: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 187, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the section designation of said amendment, insert: Sec. 356. And the Senate agree to the same. Amendment numbered 188: That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 188, and agree to the same with an amendment, as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert: SEC. 357. AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS FOR SIDING AND INTERMODAL FACILITY IN RICHLAND COUNTY, NORTH DAKOTA. Notwithstanding section 22101(a)(3) of title 49, United States Code, the State of North Dakota may use funds available to the State under section 22106(b) of such title for the building of a siding and intermodal facility proposed by the State in Sections 7 and 8, Township 133 North, Range 47 West, Richland County, North Dakota. And the Senate agree to the same. Frank R. Wolf, Tom DeLay, Ralph Regula, Harold Rogers, Jim Lightfoot, Ron Packard, Sonny Callahan, Jay Dickey, Bob Livingston, Martin Olav Sabo (except amendment 174 and amendment 190) Richard J. Durbin (except amendment 132, amendment 174, and amendment 190) Ronald D. Coleman (except amendment 174) Thomas M. Foglietta (except amendment 174) David R. Obey (except amendment 174) Managers on the Part of the House. Mark O. Hatfield, Pete V. Domenici, Arlen Specter, Christopher S. Bond, Slade Gorton, Richard C. Shelby, Frank R. Lautenberg, Tom Harkin, Barbara A. Mikulski, Managers on the Part of the Senate. JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE The managers on the part of the House and the Senate at the conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on amendments of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 2002) making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996, and for other purposes, submit the following joint statement to the House and the Senate in explanation of the effect of the action agreed upon by the managers and recommended in the accompanying conference report. congressional directives The conferees agree that Executive Branch propensities cannot substitute for Congress' own statements concerning the best evidence of Congressional intentions--that is, the official reports of the Congress. Report language included by the House that is not changed by the report of the Senate, and Senate report language that is not changed by the conference is approved by the committee of conference. The statement of the managers, while repeating some report language for emphasis, is not intended to negate the language referred to above unless expressly provided herein. program, project and activity During fiscal year 1996, for the purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99-177), as amended, with respect to funds provided for the Department of Transportation and related agencies, the terms ``program, project and activity'' shall mean any item for which a dollar amount is contained in an appropriations Act (including joint resolutions providing continuing appropriations) or accompanying reports of the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, or accompanying conference reports and joint explanatory statements of the committee of conference. In addition, the reductions made pursuant to any sequestration order to funds appropriated for ``Federal Aviation Administration, facilities and equipment'' and for ``Coast Guard, Acquisition, construction, and improvements'' shall be applied equally to each ``budget item'' that is listed under said accounts in the budget justifications submitted to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations as modified by subsequent appropriation Acts and accompanying committee reports, conference reports, or joint explanatory statements of the committee of conference. The conferees recognize that adjustments to the above allocations may be required due to changing program requirements or priorities. The conferees expect any such adjustment, if required, to be accomplished only through the normal reprogramming process. staffing increases provided by congress The conferees direct the Department of Transportation to fill expeditiously any positions added in this bill, without regard to agency-specific staffing targets which may have been previously established to meet the mandated government-wide staffing reductions. The conferees support the overall staffing reductions, and have made reductions in the bill which more than offset staffing increases provided for a small number of specific activities. TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary salaries and expenses Amendment No. 1: Appropriates $56,189,000 for salaries and expenses of the Office of the Secretary, instead of $55,011,500 as proposed by the House and $56,500,000 as proposed by the Senate. Within these funds, the conferees have provided $91,000 and 1 full-time equivalent staff year for aviation information management. The conference agreement includes the following changes to the budget request for this office: Reductions in staff, -8 FTEs............................ -$600,000 Hold reception and representation costs to 1995 levels.. -20,000 Hold travel to $365,000................................. -150,000 Reduce contractual services for acquisition, maintenance and repair of ADP equipment and commercial online data information systems, and other reductions...... -500,000 Delete funds for residual functions of the Interstate Commerce Commission................................. -4,705,000 Reductions in staff, -8 FTEs.--The conference agreement reduces the number of full time equivalent staff of the Office of the Secretary by 8 full-time equivalent staff years and $600,000. Though the conferees believe that reductions in the number of attorney advisors, public affairs specialists and congressional affairs officers will not undermine the ability of the Department to conduct its core duties and responsibilities, the conference agreement affords the Secretary the flexibility to determine the specific reductions in staff. The Secretary is directed to allocate the reduction in staff and notify the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations within fifteen days after the enactment of this Act. Travel, office of the assistant secretary for budget and programs.--The conference agreement includes $5,000 for the travel of the office of the assistant secretary for budget and programs, which is the same level imposed upon the office in fiscal year 1995. The conferees are concerned that travel for this office in fiscal year 1995 may have exceeded last year's directive and that this directive may have been circumvented by using funds from the operating administrations. The conferees reiterate that Congressional directives in this area need to be followed explicitly by this office in the future and direct that no funds be used from other sources to supplement travel by this office. Reprogramming procedures.--Over the past year, the conferees have become aware of numerous instances in which various modal administrations of the department have either misinterpreted or disregarded the existing departmental reprogramming procedures, which limit reprogrammings among programs, projects and activities to no more than ten percent unless Congressional approval is granted. The conferees reiterate that the department shall not take any action that would contravene an instruction included in the conference agreement unless such action is in accord with the established reprogramming guidelines and for which previous Congressional approval is provided. Office of intermodalism.--The conferees note that in 1991, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act created the Office of Intermodalism within the Department of Transportation to initiate and promote efficient intermodal transportation. The conferees express their support for the assistance the office has given the Department of Defense in exploring joint-use, civilian/military transportation infrastructure improvements at Biggs Army Airfield located at Fort Bliss, Texas. In consultation and cooperation with Santa Teresa, New Mexico and its proposed intermodal transportation facility, the conferees urge the Department to consider to support actively this venture. Amendment No. 2: Provides $40,000 for official reception and representation expenses as proposed by the House instead of $60,000 as proposed by the Senate. Amendment No. 3: Includes language that prohibits funds from being used to maintain ``custody'' of airline tariffs as proposed by the Senate, instead of language that prohibits funds to maintain ``duplicate physical copies'' of airline tariffs as proposed by the House. Amendment No. 4: Includes the words ``and open'' as proposed by the Senate, instead of ``or open them'' as proposed by the House. office of civil rights Amendment No. 5: Appropriates $6,554,000 for the Office of Civil Rights as proposed by the House instead of $12,083,000 as proposed by the Senate. The conference agreement disallows the transfer of 65 FTEs and $5,158,000 to consolidate external civil rights functions in the office of the Secretary. The conferees are concerned that the proposal to consolidate the various modal offices of civil rights into one office under the guidance of the secretary may dilute the power and flexibility of those offices to respond to the needs of small and minority businesses participating in the various programs of the modal administrations. transportation planning, research, and development Amendment No. 6: Appropriates $8,220,000 for transportation planning, research, and development instead of $3,309,000 as proposed by the House and $9,710,000 as proposed by the Senate. The conference agreement provides $3,900,000 for the integrated personnel/payroll system; $2,809,000 for transportation planning studies; $1,000,000 for aviation management systems; and $500,000 for the docket management system. Funding of $6,195,000 for the automated procurement system is deferred. Railroad Safety Institute.--The conferees urge the Department to consider providing funds to establish the Railroad Safety Insti- tute. This relates to a Senate provision in amendment numbered 185. working capital fund Amendment No. 7: Limits expenses of the working capital fund to $103,149,000, instead of $102,231,000 as proposed by the House and $104,364,000 as proposed by the Senate. The conference agreement includes the following reductions to the budget request: Disallowance of transfer from OST of intermodal data network............................................. -$453,000 Hold non-pay inflationary increases to 1.5 percent...... -262,000 Reduction in WCF-funded travel.......................... -300,000 Reduction in executive training and development programs -200,000 payments to air carriers (liquidation of contract authorization) (airport and airway trust fund) (including rescission of contract authorization) Amendment No. 8: Appropriates $22,600,000 to liquidate contract authority obligations for payments to air carriers instead of $15,000,000 as proposed by the House and $26,738,536 as proposed by the Senate. Amendment No. 9: Limits obligations for payments to air carriers to $22,600,000, instead of $15,000,000 as proposed by the House and $26,738,536 as proposed by the Senate. The conferees fully intend that all essential air service communities that are participating in the program in fiscal year 1995 will continue to be eligible for participation in the essential air service program in fiscal year 1996, albeit at reduced levels. The conferees expect that the Department may be required to make pro-rata reductions in the subsidy or daily/ weekly service levels to manage the funding reductions included in the conference report. Amendment No. 10: Includes language proposed by the House that prohibits payments to air carriers in communities fewer than seventy highway miles from the nearest large or medium hub airport instead of seventy-five highway miles as proposed by the Senate. Amendment No. 11: Deletes ``or small'' proposed by the Senate. The program mileage criteria retained in the conference agreement pertain only to distances from the nearest ``large or medium'' hub airport as proposed by the House. Amendment No. 12: Deletes exception to essential air service program mileage criteria for communities having certain airline maintenance facilities proposed by the Senate. The House bill contained no similar exception. Amendment No. 13: Includes language proposed by the House that allows essential air service subsidies to communities located greater than two hundred and ten miles from the nearest large or medium hub airport instead of two hundred miles as proposed by the Senate. Amendment No. 14: Rescinds $16,000,000 in contract authority from the payments to air carriers program instead of $23,600,000 as proposed by the House and $11,861,464 as proposed by the Senate. The conference agreement rescinds contract authority that is not available for obligation due to annual limits on obligations. Amendment No. 15: Deletes House language that would require the state, local government, or other non-Federal entity to pay at least fifty percent of the cost of providing essential air service. The conferees recognize that many states' legislatures are not in session at this time and would have difficulty responding to the cost sharing requirements contained in the House bill. The conferees note, however, that states, local governments and non-Federal entitles should begin pursuing cost sharing mechanisms in anticipation of a fifty percent cost share requirement in fiscal year 1997. rental payments Amendment No. 16: Appropriates $135,200,000 for rental payments instead of $130,803,000 as proposed by the House and $139,689,000 as proposed by the Senate. Amendment No. 17: Provides $17,685,000 in rental payments from ``Federal-aid highways, Limitation on general operating expenses'' as proposed by the Senate instead of $17,099,000 as proposed by the House. minority business outreach Amendment No. 18: Appropriates $2,900,000 for minority business outreach activities as proposed by the House instead of $2,100,000 as proposed by the Senate. Amendment No. 19: Provides that of the funds appropriated for minority business outreach activities, $2,642,000 shall be available until September 30, 1997, as proposed by the House instead of $1,842,000 as proposed by the Senate. Amendment No. 20: Provides that funds appropriated for minority business outreach activities may be used for business opportunities related to any mode of transportation as proposed by the Senate. The House bill contained no similar provision. interstate commerce commission sunset Amendment No. 21: Deletes appropriation of $4,705,000 for the Interstate Commerce Commission Sunset activities proposed by the Senate. The House bill contained no similar appropriation. Funding for these activities is included under amendment numbered 166. Coast Guard operating expenses Amendment No. 22: Appropriates $2,278,991,000 for Coast Guard operating expenses instead of $2,565,607,000 as proposed by the House and $2,286,000,000 as proposed by the Senate. The conference agreement assumes that additional funding of $300,000,000 will be provided in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1996. The following table shows detailed adjustments to the budget estimate in the House and Senate recommendations and the conference agreement by budget activity: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- House bill Sente bill Conference ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pay and allowances: Budget estimate.................................... $1,591,835,000 $1,591,835,000 $1,591,835,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Military pay and benefits: Military pay raise (2.2%)...................... -1,401,000 0 0 Military essentiality.......................... -1,000,000 0 -1,000,000 General detail................................. -3,000,000 -3,000,000 -3,000,000 Leased housing (transfer)...................... -14,900,000 -14,900,000 -14,900,000 Civilian pay and benefits: SES staffing................................... +1,000,000 0 0 Youth opportunity staffing..................... -825,000 -825,000 -825,000 Medical care and equipment: Hold costs to fiscal year 1995 level................................... -6,300,000 0 -2,835,000 Leased housing (by transfer)....................... +14,900,000 +14,900,000 +14,900,000 Budget activity-wide: Accelerate existing streamlining............... -4,850,000 0 -4,850,000 Accelerate fiscal year 1997 restructuring...... -5,000,000 0 0 Undistributed.................................. +175,000 -8,000,000 0 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 1,570,634,000 1,580,010,000 1,579,325,000 ======================================================== Depot level maintenance: Aircraft........................................... 139,041,000 139,041,000 138,124,000 Electronics........................................ 31,549,000 31,549,000 31,549,000 Shore facilities................................... 95,645,000 94,126,000 93,963,000 Vessels............................................ 99,081,000 99,081,000 98,465,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended............................... 365,316,000 363,797,000 362,101,000 ======================================================== Operations and support: Budget estimate.................................... 400,496,000 400,496,000 400,496,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Area operations and support: Cutters--high endurance........................ 0 -263,000 -263,000 Area offices................................... 0 -823,000 -823,000 Maintenance and logistics commands............. 0 -2,734,000 -2,734,000 Communications stations........................ 0 -155,000 0 District operations and support: District offices............................... -5,600,000 0 -2,800,000 Groups and bases............................... 0 -577,000 -577,000 Combined group/air stations.................... 0 -359,000 -359,000 Marine safety offices.......................... 0 -1,285,000 -1,285,000 LORAN stations................................. 0 -237,000 -237,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 394,896,000 394,063,000 391,418,000 ======================================================== Recruiting and training: Budget estimate.................................... 70,943,000 70,943,000 70,943,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Graduate school tuition........................................... -1,000,000 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended............................... 69,943,000 70,943,000 70,943,000 ======================================================== Coast Guard-wide centralized services and support: Budget estimate.................................... 189,726,000 189,726,000 189,726,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Headquarters-managed units: TISCOM......................................... 0 -19,000 -19,000 Military personnel center...................... -150,000 0 -150,000 Activities Europe.............................. 0 -1,372,000 -1,372,000 Headquarters administration: Hold to 1.7 percent increase................... -2,000,000 0 -2,000,000 Reduce by three-tenths of 1 percent............ 0 -325,000 0 Centralized bill paying: FTS 2000....................................... -1,434,000 -560,000 -900,000 FEC............................................ -647,000 0 -647,000 Unemployment compensation...................... -115,000 -115,000 -115,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 185,380,000 187,335,000 184,523,000 ======================================================== Account-wide adjustments: Recreational equipment............................. -146,000 -146,000 -146,000 Non-pay inflation.................................. -5,842,000 -5,842,000 -5,842,000 Non-operational travel............................. -1,831,000 -1,831,000 -1,831,000 MPPC contracting out............................... -500,000 0 0 Undistributed...................................... -10,243,000 -2,329,000 0 VTS contracting out................................ -1,000,000 0 -1,000,000 Studies and analysis............................... -1,000,000 0 -500,000 Defense bill--offset............................... 0 -300,000,000 -300,000,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended............................... -20,562,000 -310,148,000 -309,319,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Total appropriation.............................. 2,565,607,000 2,286,000,000 2,278,991,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reprogramming procedures.--The House report expressed concern that the Coast Guard has misinterpreted the existing departmental reprogramming procedures, which limit reprogrammings among programs, projects, and activities [PPAs] to a specified percentage unless Congressional notification and approval is granted, and which define PPAs. In response, the Coast Guard stated they are unaware of any such guidelines. The conferees are concerned that the Coast Guard is unaware of the document titled ``Reprogramming Guidelines'' issued on April 13, 1992 to each of the operating administrations by the Assistant Secretary for Budget and Programs, in which these and other important procedures are specified. Consequently, the conferees direct the Assistant Secretary for Budget and Programs to re-issue this guidance to all operating administrations as soon as possible, and to report to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations regarding the Coast Guard's compliance with those guidelines under the service's current practices. Military/civilian staffing ratio.--The conference agreement includes a reduction of $1,000,000 for conversion of military support positions to civilian positions, as proposed by the House, and no additional senior executive service [SES] positions, as proposed by the Senate. The House believed that a modest increase in the ratio of civilians to military staffing in the Coast Guard and additional SES positions would lead to budget savings, management stability, and stronger ``corporate memory'' than is presently the case. While supporting the concept of military-to-civilian conversion, the Senate assumed no savings from that conversion and did not agree that additional SES positions were necessary. The conferees agree that this topic should be more fully explored, and direct the U.S. General Accounting Office to follow up on its past work in this area by conducting a thorough analysis of the Coast Guard's military/civilian staffing ratio to determine the benefits of greater military-to-civilian conversion, including senior civilian management positions such as the senior executive service. Marine safety resources.--The conferees concur in the initiative of the Senate and have provided adequate funds within the amounts made available for military pay and marine safety office (MSO) operations to restore the marine safety billets slated for termination. The conferees expect funds provided for MSO operations above the fiscal year 1995 level first to be used for annualization of fiscal year 1995 follow- on costs and then to restore the operating costs associated with these 21 billets. The conferees expect the Commandant to submit the report on these restored billets as requested by the Senate. Military personnel center.--The conference agreement includes a reduction of $150,000 for recruiting activities. These activities should be funded under ``recruiting and training'', not under this project. Vessel traffic service contracting out.--The conference agreement includes a reduction of $1,000,000 in the operating cost of vessel traffic service [VTS] systems across the country, as proposed by the House. This represents a 5 percent reduction from the budgeted level of $19,862,000. The conferees believe that VTS system operations are a prime candidate for contract operation, and that such systems could be operated at less cost than is presently the case with government employees. The Coast Guard has a study underway to address the long-term viability of retaining the VTS mission within the Coast Guard budget, and the conferees await the results of that study next year. However, this interim step is necessary due to budget constraints and to assist in determining the lowest cost method of operating VTS systems within the Coast Guard budget. Southern Lake Michigan air facility.--The conference report includes funds to maintain a Coast Guard search and rescue air facility located in southern Lake Michigan. Amendment No. 23: Provides that, of the total funding provided for ``Operating expenses'', $20,000,000 shall be expended from the Boat Safety Account of the Aquatic Resources Trust Fund instead of $25,000,000 as proposed by the House and no funds as proposed by the Senate. Under current law, the Coast Guard is authorized to expend from the trust fund for boating safety activities an amount equal to the amount appropriated for the boat safety grants program. Amendment No. 24: Deletes House language specifying that no less than $314,200,000 is available for drug enforcement activities, as proposed by the Senate. Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements Amendment No. 25: Appropriates $362,375,000 for ``Acquisition, construction, and improvements'' instead of $375,175,000 as proposed by the House and $366,800,000 as proposed by the Senate. The conferees also approve reprogrammings totaling $38,000,000, resulting in overall program resources of $400,375,000 for fiscal year 1996. A table showing the distribution of this appropriation by project as included in the fiscal year 1996 budget estimate, House bill, Senate bill, and the conference agreement follows: ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENTS: CONFERENCE AGREEMENT--FISCAL YEAR 1996 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal year 1996 Fiscal year 1996 Fiscal year 1996 Conference Program name estimate House Senate agreement ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vessels: Survey and design--cutters and boats.......................... $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 Seagoing buoy tender (WLB) replacement.................... 65,000,000 65,000,000 65,000,000 65,000,000 Coastal buoy tender (WLM) replacement.................... 93,000,000 93,000,000 93,000,000 93,000,000 47-foot motor lifeboat (MLB) replacement project............ 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Buoy boat replacement project (BUSL)......................... 8,500,000 0 8,500,000 0 Polar icebreaker replacement follow-on...................... 4,300,000 4,300,000 0 0 82-foot WPB capability replacement.................... 4,000,000 0 0 0 Norwegian crewing concept development (NORCREW).......... 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0 Self propelled barge replacement 900,000 900,000 0 0 Surface search radar replacement project........................ 3,500,000 3,500,000 0 0 210-foot medium endurance cutter MMA............................ 14,500,000 14,500,000 10,500,000 6,000,000 378-foot shipboard command & control........................ 1,300,000 1,300,000 0 0 Configuration management........ 5,700,000 5,700,000 0 2,600,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total vessels................. 203,700,000 191,200,000 178,000,000 167,600,000 =========================================================================== Aircraft: Traffic alert & collision avoidance system (TCAS) phase IV............................. 13,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 Global positioning system installation phase VI.......... 1,900,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 HH-65 Helicopter main transmission gearbox upgrade phase II....................... 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 HC-130 side looking airborne radar (SLAR) upgrade........... 2,100,000 2,100,000 2,100,000 2,100,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total aircraft................ 19,500,000 16,500,000 14,500,000 12,000,000 =========================================================================== Other equipment: Supply center computer replacement.................... 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Fleet logistics system.......... 3,000,000 3,000,000 0 3,000,000 Vessel traffic service (VTS) system 2000.................... 5,000,000 5,000,000 2,000,000 3,400,000 VTS equipment replacement....... 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,900,000 Marine information for safety and law enforcement (MISLE).... 11,000,000 11,000,000 11,000,000 11,000,000 Conversion of software applications................... 11,100,000 6,100,000 9,000,000 8,500,000 Finance center information system replacement............. 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Differential GPS transmitter replacement.................... 1,700,000 0 1,700,000 1,700,000 Differential GPS implementation-- second district................ 2,400,000 0 2,400,000 0 Search and rescue simulation model (SARSIM)................. 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Communication systems 2000...... 11,000,000 6,000,000 11,000,000 11,000,000 WLB/WLM support facility........ 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Vessel navigation training simulator...................... 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Local notice to mariners automation..................... 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Global maritime distress and safety system.................. 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Operational information system.. 0 0 0 1,200,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total other equipment......... 56,300,000 42,200,000 47,600,000 49,200,000 =========================================================================== Shore facilities and aids to navigation: Survey and design--shore projects....................... 8,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 Minor AC&I shore construction projects....................... 5,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Streamlining initiatives........ 5,000,000 5,000,000 0 0 Air station consolidation....... 11,00,000 11,000,000 0 0 Coast Guard Yard ship handling facility (phase II)............ 15,100,000 0 7,000,000 7,000,000 Public family quarters.......... 22,700,000 20,275,000 8,900,000 9,175,000 Station Boothbay Harbor, ME-- renovate/expand................ 2,800,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 Base South Portland, ME-- construct station operations bldg........................... 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 Base San Juan, PR-- reconstruction................. 3,150,000 3,150,000 0 0 Station Port Isabel, TX-- reconstruct/expand waterfront facilities..................... 2,650,000 2,650,000 2,650,000 2,650,000 Station Portage, MI--relocate/ replace station facilities..... 4,200,000 4,200,000 4,200,000 2,300,000 Station Chetco River, OR-- construct mooring/waterfront... 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Station Honolulu, HI-- replacement.................... 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Waterways ATON projects......... 5,500,000 5,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 Overseas LORAN closure.......... 0 0 0 -1,900,000 Streamlining initiatives: New London, CT: Academy (Roland Hall renovation)............... 5,100,000 5,100,000 0 3,900,000 New London, CT: Academy (CPO & leadership schools)............ 0 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 New London: CT: Academy (Galley renovation).................... 0 0 0 5,000,000 Wadsworth, NY: Group/MSO/VTC Center......................... 0 0 9,000,000 9,000,000 Rosebank, NY: Pier and station rehabilitation................. 0 0 4,000,000 4,000,000 Rosebank, NY: Moorings.......... 0 0 0 3,900,000 Bayonne, NJ: Pier improvements/ ANT team facilities............ 0 0 5,700,000 5,700,000 Sandy Hook, NJ: Construct group engineering building........... 0 0 2,750,000 2,750,000 Portsmouth, VA: Support center administrative space........... 0 0 4,000,000 4,000,000 Boston, MA: Support center rehabilitation................. 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 Yorktown, VA: Reserve training center yeoman school mods...... 0 0 1,100,000 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total shore facilities and aids to navigation........... 99,800,000 82,200,000 80,200,000 88,875,000 =========================================================================== Personnel and related support: Direct personnel costs.......... 48,200,000 42,500,000 46,000,000 44,200,000 Core acquisition costs.......... 700,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total personnel and related... 48,900,000 43,000,000 46,500,000 44,700,000 =========================================================================== Total appropriations.......... 428,200,000 375,175,000 366,800,000 362,375,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amendment No. 26: Provides $167,600,000 to acquire, repair, renovate or improve vessels, small boats and related equipment instead of $191,200,000 as proposed by the House and $178,000,000 as proposed by the Senate. In addition, the conference agreement includes the reprogramming of $14,000,000 from the seagoing and coastal buoy tender [WLB/WLM] programs, to be reallocated to the following programs: Polar icebreaker replacement............................ $4,300,000 NORCREW search and rescue boat.......................... 2,000,000 Self-propelled barge.................................... 900,000 Surface search radar replacement........................ 3,500,000 378-foot shipboard command and control.................. 1,300,000 210-foot cutter MMA..................................... 2,000,000 Stern loading buoy boat [BUSL] replacement.--The conference agreement provides no funding for this project, as proposed by the House, instead of $8,500,000 as proposed by the Senate. This should be interpreted as a deferral of additional funding, and not Congressional desire to terminate the project. Due to project delays, prior year funding is available to continue this effort through fiscal year 1996 without additional appropriation. Amendment No. 27: Provides $12,000,000 to acquire new aircraft and increase aviation capability instead of $16,500,000 as proposed by the House and $14,500,000 as proposed by the Senate. RU-38A wing assembly upgrade.--The conferees understand the Coast Guard has identified a particular upgrade to the center wing assembly of the RU-38A surveillance aircraft which could significantly enhance the aircraft's service life, range and endurance on operational missions. The conferees understand that additional funding may be required to conduct this upgrade, and encourage the Coast Guard to submit a reprogramming proposal to the Congress for this work if the Coast Guard determines the project to be of sufficient priority. Amendment No. 28: Provides $49,200,000 for other equipment instead of $42,200,000 as proposed by the House and $47,600,000 as proposed by the Senate. Operational information system.--The conference agreement includes $1,200,000 for procurement and evaluation of prototypes of the operational information system [OIS], proposed by the House under the ``Research, development, test and evaluation'' [RDT&E] appropriation. In its appeal to the conferees, the Coast Guard suggested that RDT&E was not the appropriate account for this project. Consequently, the conference agreement includes funding under this appropriation. Amendment No. 29: Provides $88,875,000 for shore facilities and aids to navigation facilities instead of $82,275,000 as proposed by the House and $80,200,000 as proposed by the Senate. In addition, the conference agreement includes the reprogramming of $24,000,000 from various shore facilities as listed in the Senate report (-$22,100,000) and from the overseas Loran-C closure program (-$1,900,000), to be reallocated to the following programs: Air station consolidation............................... $11,000,000 Public family quarters.................................. 11,100,000 Station Portage, MI..................................... 1,900,000 Amendment No. 30: Provides $44,700,000 for acquisition- related personnel compensation, benefits and related costs instead of $43,000,000 as proposed by the House and $46,500,000 as proposed by the Senate. Amendment No. 31: Deletes House language that would have allowed the Secretary to transfer up to $50,000,000 within the AC&I appropriation for implementation costs associated with Coast Guard streamlining plans. The Senate bill provided funding for specific streamlining projects rather than transfer authority for unspecified projects. The conference agreement adopts the Senate approach, providing $42,750,000 for ten streamlining projects. This compares to $31,050,000 in the Senate bill. The budget request included $5,000,000 for unspecified projects. The conferees are very supportive of the Coast Guard's streamlining efforts and look forward to reviewing specific proposals next year in detail. Amendment No. 32: Provides that the Commandant may dispose of surplus real property by sale or lease and the proceeds shall be credited to this appropriation. The Senate bill required disposal by sale or lease. The House bill contained no similar provision. port safety development Amendment No. 33: Appropriates $15,000,000 for debt retirement of the Port of Portland, Oregon, to remain available until expended, as proposed by the Senate. The House bill contained no similar appropriation. alteration of bridges Amendment No. 34: Appropriates $16,000,000 for the alteration or removal of obstructive bridges as proposed by the House instead of $2,000,000 as proposed by the Senate. A table comparing the fiscal year 1996 estimate, House bill, Senate bill, and conference agreement by bridge and location follows: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal year Conference 1996 estimate House bill Senate bill agreement ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bridge and location: Burlington, IA, Burlington Northern RR Bridge..................................... $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 New Orleans, LA, Florida Avenue RR/HW Bridge .............. 2,000,000 .............. 2,000,000 Brunswick, GA, Sidney Lanier HW Bridge...... .............. 8,000,000 .............. 8,000,000 Chelsea St. Bridge, Boston, MA.............. .............. 2,000,000 .............. 2,000,000 Limehouse HW Bridge, St. John's Island, SC.. .............. 2,000,000 .............. 2,000,000 --------------------------------------------------------------- Total................................... 2,000,000 16,000,000 2,000,000 16,000,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- reserve training Amendment No. 35: Appropriates $62,000,000 for reserve training as proposed by the Senate instead of $61,859,000 as proposed by the House. Research, development, test, and evaluation Amendment No. 36: Appropriates $18,000,000 for research, development, test, and evaluation instead of $18,500,000 as proposed by the House and $20,000,000 as proposed by the Senate. The following table summarizes the fiscal year 1996 budget estimate, House and Senate recommendations, and the conference agreement by program, project and activity: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal year 1996 Conference Program area estimate House bill Senate bill agreement ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Improve search and rescue capability: Search planning................. $100,000 $100,000 ................. $100,000 Search process, platforms and sensors........................ 400,000 400,000 ................. 400,000 Personnel....................... 432,000 432,000 ................. 432,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 932,000 932,000 500,000 932,000 =========================================================================== Waterways safety and management: Waterways management............ 500,000 500,000 ................. 400,000 Advanced vessel traffic systems/ services....................... 600,000 100,000 ................. 275,000 Integrated navigation systems... 450,000 450,000 ................. 450,000 Short range aids to navigation.. 400,000 200,000 ................. 200,000 Advanced GPS development........ 0 0 ................. 0 Personnel....................... 864,000 864,000 ................. 864,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 2,814,000 2,114,000 1,325,000 2,189,000 =========================================================================== Marine safety: Marine safety research.......... 530,000 200,000 ................. 200,000 Human factors analysis.......... 1,685,000 700,000 ................. 1,050,000 Fire safety for commercial vessels........................ 960,000 750,000 ................. 750,000 Personnel....................... 972,000 700,000 ................. 700,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 4,147,000 2,350,000 2,000,000 2,700,000 =========================================================================== Ship structure committee: Support for Committee........... 250,000 0 0 0 Personnel....................... 36,000 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 286,000 0 0 0 =========================================================================== Marine environmental protection: Planning, management and training....................... 150,000 150,000 ................. 150,000 Detection/surveillance systems.. 0 0 ................. 0 Oil pollution response.......... 850,000 500,000 ................. 625,000 Personnel health and safety..... 75,000 75,000 ................. 75,000 Port demonstration project...... 0 0 ................. 0 OPA90 regional grant program.. 0 0 ................. 0 HazChem countermeasures and safety......................... 0 0 ................. 0 Personnel....................... 504,000 504,000 ................. 504,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 1,579,000 1,229,000 1,075,000 1,354,000 =========================================================================== Maritime law enforcement: Surveillance.................... 725,000 725,000 ................. 725,000 Vessel search................... 0 0 ................. 0 Sensor integration information.. 0 0 ................. 0 Personnel....................... 504,000 504,000 ................. 504,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 1,229,000 1,229,000 725,000 1,229,000 =========================================================================== Safety and environmental compliance: Cutter fire safety technology... 600,000 586,000 0 586,000 Pollution prevention............ 500,000 500,000 0 500,000 Aviation engineering support.... 75,000 0 0 0 Vessel loss exposure and risk analysis methology............. 620,000 620,000 0 620,000 Personnel....................... 612,000 612,000 ................. 612,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 2,407,000 2,318,000 0 2,318,000 =========================================================================== Human resource management effectiveness: Training techniques and technologies................... 300,000 0 0 100,000 Staffing standards development.. 0 0 0 0 Personnel....................... 144,000 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 444,000 0 0 100,000 =========================================================================== Command, control, computers and intelligence: Information systems............. 280,000 1,780,000 0 280,000 Advanced communications systems. 0 0 0 0 Personnel....................... 648,000 648,000 0 648,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 928,000 2,428,000 0 928,000 =========================================================================== Technology base: Future technology assessment.... 300,000 0 0 0 Modeling........................ 150,000 0 0 0 Select projects................. 450,000 300,000 0 300,000 Personnel....................... 684,000 200,000 0 200,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 1,584,000 500,000 0 500,000 =========================================================================== R&D personnel, program support and operations: Admin/support personnel and related costs.................. 3,100,000 2,600,000 0 2,850,000 Support and operations.......... 1,700,000 1,500,000 0 1,600,000 R&D management info system development.................... 500,000 450,000 0 450,000 Modernization of F&STD test facilities..................... 850,000 850,000 0 850,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 6,150,000 5,400,000 0 5,750,000 =========================================================================== Mission capabilities assessment..... 0 0 1,780,000 0 Multimission/administrative support........................ 0 0 12,595,000 0 Other projects: South Florida oil spill research center......................... 0 0 0 0 Maritime Fire and Research Assoc.......................... 0 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total......................... 0 0 0 0 =========================================================================== Total appropriations.......... 22,500,000 18,500,000 20,000,000 18,000,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- boat safety (aquatic resources trust fund) Amendment No. 37: Appropriates $20,000,000 for boat safety grants as proposed by the House instead of no funding as proposed by the Senate. The budget proposal and the Senate recommendation assumed this program would be fully funded as a mandatory appropriation beginning in fiscal year 1996. When combined with an estimated $10,000,000 in mandatory spending authorized by the Clean Vessel Act of 1992, total program resources are $30,000,000 for fiscal year 1996, which compares to $32,500,000 for fiscal year 1995. Notwithstanding the difficult budget constraints faced by the Congress, the conferees believe that to convert discretionary grant programs such as this one to mandatory funding--avoiding annual budget review and competition with other programs in the appropriations process--would undermine fiscal constraint and lessen congressional oversight in an area which has the country's second highest number of transportation-related fatalities and is currently on the National Transportation Safety Board's list of ``most wanted'' safety improvements. Rather than put this program on an automatic spending status and lessen oversight, the conferees believe the Coast Guard and the department could more effectively use these grant funds to target states with poor boat safety records, and provide leveraged funding for safety improvements. The conferees also note the Coast Guard is in error when it assumes that funding for this and other maritime programs comes at the expense of its operating budget. The conferees wish to make clear to the Coast Guard and the department that, while funding for boating safety grants is clearly a portion of the overall allocation of budgetary resources in this bill, it should not be assumed that reductions have been made in Coast Guard operating expenses to accommodate this or any other important maritime programs in the bill. emergency fund (limitation on permanent appropriations) (oil spill liability trust fund) Amendment No. 38: Deletes limitation of $3,000,000 on the permanent appropriation authorized in section 1012(a)(4) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 proposed by the House. The Senate bill contained no similar limitation. Federal Aviation Administration operations (including transfer of funds) Amendment No. 39: Inserts heading ``including transfer of funds'' as proposed by the Senate. This is necessary due to the disposition of amendment numbered 46. Amendment No. 40: Appropriates $4,645,712,000 for FAA operations instead of $4,600,000,000 as proposed by the House and $4,550,000,000 as proposed by the Senate. The following table summarizes adjustments to the budget estimate in the House and Senate bills and the conference agreement, by budget activity: FAA OPERATIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conference House bill Senate bill agreement ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operation of the ATC system: Budget estimate.................................... $2,228,634,000 $2,228,634,000 $2,228,634,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Contract tower streamlining.................... -6,520,000 0 0 ``Quality through partnership''................ -1,790,000 0 -1,790,000 General reduction.............................. 0 -28,310,000 0 Accelerated promotion.......................... 0 0 -4,300,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 2,220,324,000 2,200,324,000 2,222,544,000 ======================================================== NAS logistics support: Budget estimate.................................... 185,158,000 185,158,000 185,158,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Motor fleet, FAALC............................. -3,100,000 0 0 Depot spares................................... +4,000,000 0 0 General reduction.............................. 0 +4,493,000 0 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 186,058,000 180,665,000 185,158,000 ======================================================== Maintenance of ATC system: Budget estimate.................................... 868,297,000 868,297,000 868,297,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: AMASS maintenance.............................. -2,000,000 0 -2,000,000 OASIS maintenance.............................. -100,000 0 -100,000 Undefined inflation............................ 0 -3,602,000 -3,602,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 866,197,000 864,695,000 862,595,000 ======================================================== Leased telecommunications: Budget estimate.................................... 328,423,000 328,423,000 328,423,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Administrative communications.................. -4,680,000 0 -1,500,000 WECO switch offset............................. -2,000,000 0 -2,000,000 General reduction.............................. 0 -2,078,000 0 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 321,743,000 326,345,000 324,923,000 ======================================================== Aviation regulation/certification: Budget estimate.................................... 399,711,000 399,711,000 399,711,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Flight standards staff increase................ -4,954,000 -4,954,000 0 New data systems............................... -1,634,000 -1,634,000 -1,634,000 PCS moves...................................... -617,000 -617,000 -617,000 OMEGA navigation system........................ -8,556,000 -2,056,000 -1,840,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 383,950,000 390,450,000 395,620,000 ======================================================== Aviation standards: Budget estimate.................................... 111,395,000 111,395,000 111,395,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Hold costs to fiscal year 1995 level........... -2,644,000 -2,644,000 -2,644,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 108,751,000 108,751,000 108,751,000 ======================================================== Aviation security: Budget estimate.................................... 65,769,000 65,769,000 65,769,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Hold costs to fiscal year 1995 level........... -920,000 0 0 General reduction.............................. 0 -769,000 0 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 64,849,000 65,000,000 65,769,000 ======================================================== NAS Design and management Budget estimate.................................... 53,277,000 53,277,000 53,277,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: General reduction.............................. -8,277,000 -277,000 -3,000,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 45,000,000 53,000,000 50,277,000 ======================================================== Administration of airports: Budget estimate.................................... 42,173,000 42,173,000 42,173,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Staffing increase.............................. -643,000 -673,000 -650,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 41,530,000 41,500,000 41,523,000 ======================================================== Commercial space transportation: Budget estimate.................................... 6,541,000 6,541,000 6,541,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Hold travel to fiscal year 1995 level.......... -45,000 -45,000 -45,000 Contract programs.............................. -666,000 -666,000 -666,000 Delete industry support........................ -60,000 -60,000 -60,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 5,770,000 5,770,000 5,770,000 ======================================================== Human resource management: Budget estimate.................................... 231,947,000 231,947,000 231,947,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Labor, personnel and human relations........... -22,142,000 0 -17,197,000 Centralized training........................... -10,050,000 0 -8,000,000 MARC........................................... +250,000 0 +250,000 General reduction.............................. 0 -23,447,000 0 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 200,005,000 208,500,000 207,000,000 ======================================================== Executive direction and management: Budget estimate.................................... 189,216,000 189,216,000 189,216,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: Staffing reductions............................ -5,390,000 0 -3,169,000 Regional public affairs staffing............... -2,047,000 0 -2,047,000 General reduction.............................. -6,779,000 -9,216,000 0 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... 175,000,000 180,000,000 184,000,000 ======================================================== Account-wide adjustments: Administration aircraft............................ -3,600,000 0 -1,500,000 Adjustments to budget estimate: SAE grant.......................................... -105,000 0 0 Overseas personnel assignments..................... -500,000 0 -500,000 Non-pay inflation.................................. -4,824,000 0 -4,824,000 Workers' compensation.............................. -1,394,000 0 -1,394,000 Undistributed...................................... -8,754,000 -15,000,000 0 Operational pay differential....................... 0 -45,000,000 0 Non-pay inflation, administrative aircraft, and GSA vehicles.......................................... 0 -5,000,000 0 -------------------------------------------------------- Amount recommended........................... -19,177,000 -65,000,000 -8,218,000 ======================================================== Offsetting receipts: Amount recommended 0 -10,000,000 0 -------------------------------------------------------- Total appropriation.............................. 4,600,000,000 4,550,000,000 4,645,712,000 Transfer from Coast Guard........................ ................. ................. 60,000,000 -------------------------------------------------------- Total funding.................................... 4,600,000,000 4,550,000,000 4,705,712,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contract tower streamlining program.--The conferees agree to restore the reduction of $6,520,000 proposed by the House for this program, but agree with the House's observation that in past years, funds for this important program have not been spent as intended, but reprogrammed to other activities. The conferees believe these delays have been at least partly due to wage determinations required administratively by the Department of Labor. Since the conferees agree with the Senate language amending and streamlining the wage determination process, it is hoped the contract tower program will move forward without further delay and achieve the promised budgetary savings. The FAA is directed not to reprogram any of the $6,520,000 appropriated for this program. ``Quality through partnership'' program.--The conference agreement deletes the $1,790,000 budgeted for this program, as proposed by the House. The conferees direct that no funds be reprogrammed for this activity during fiscal year 1996. Accelerated promotion.--Since completion of House and Senate action on this bill, program savings of $4,300,000 have been found resulting from discontinuation of the accelerated promotion program for air traffic controllers. When the Training Agreement for Accelerated Promotions expired on July 15, 1995 and the administration made a decision not to renew the program, these funds became excess to budgetary requirements. This program allowed controllers to receive grade-to-grade promotions without fulfilling the time-in-grade requirements applicable to other federal employees. The conferees have used these savings to restore funding for additional FAA safety and certification inspectors, in order to provide the highest level of aviation safety possible. Aviation safety inspectors.--The conference agreement fully funds the administration's request for 233 additional aviation safety inspectors, including an additional 117 general aviation inspectors. This is in addition to the increase in staffing provided for fiscal year 1995. Between fiscal year 1994 and 1996, end-of-year staffing in this area has risen from 4,051 to a funded level of 4,606, a two-year increase of almost 14 percent. Despite difficult budget constraints, the conferees believe this is a high priority safety area worthy of additional funding. Flight service stations.--The conferees do not intend for FAA to close flight service stations not in the currently- approved plan, and believe funding in the conference agreement is sufficient for the FAA to continue to operate and maintain its existing network of flight service stations around the country. Allocation of budget reductions.--The conferees reiterate to FAA and departmental officials that the funding allocations and reductions specified in the bill, as detailed and explained in this joint explanatory statement of the committee of conference, are the best expressions of Congressional intentions regarding the proper uses of appropriated funds. Should the department decide to reduce activities below the levels specified or implied herein, and in particular if activities are to be substantially reduced or terminated by agency action which is not specifically addressed in this statement, the department shall receive prior Congressional approval through the reprogramming process. Mid-America Aviation Resource Consortium.--The conferees agree to provide $250,000 for continued support of the Mid- America Aviation Resource Consortium, as proposed by the House, but intend that this be the final year of federal support for this facility unless requested in the President's budget. Loran-C automatic blink system.--The conferees agree with the House's direction to expedite implementation of the automatic blink system for the Loran-C navigation system. Aurora, IL en route center.--The conferees recognize the urgency of solving the problems causing computer outages at the FAA's air traffic control center in Aurora, Illinois. The Aurora center is one of the busier in the world and a critical link in our nation's air traffic control system. Years of delay in updating the present equipment have resulted in an obsolete, aged, and failure-prone system at the Aurora center. FAA has worked diligently to develop an interim solution to this problem as quickly as is technologically feasible, pending installation of a new air traffic control system for the nation. The conferees deem maintenance of reliable operational capability at the Aurora center to be in the national interest of maintaining an efficient and viable national air transportation system, and deem the implementation of interim solutions to the problems causing computer outages to be an urgent national priority. FAA should simplify and expedite its procurement process to the maximum extent feasible, and should allocate all necessary personnel resources to assure that the existing system remains in reliable working order. If FAA determines that additional technological or personnel resources are necessary to develop and implement interim solutions to these problems, then the Congress would give serious consideration to providing such additional resources. The conference agreement includes $20,000,000, as proposed by the Senate, for the display channel complex rehost program, which will upgrade the computers at Aurora and similar centers. Amendment No. 41: Provides that $2,222,859,100 shall be derived from the airport and airway trust fund instead of $1,871,500,000 as proposed by the House and $1,865,000,000 as proposed by the Senate. Amendment No. 42: Allows funds for any ``agency'' services to be credited to this appropriation, as proposed by the Senate. The House bill specified that only receipts for ``aviation'' services be credited to the appropriation. Amendment No. 43: Requires that funds credited to the appropriation be ``receipts for'' certain services, as proposed by the Senate. The House bill contained no similar language. Amendment No. 44: Deletes Senate language allowing $10,000,000 in additional safety and security fees to be credited to this appropriation. The conferees have not yet seen adequate details from the administration demonstrating the unequivocal need for new fees, an explanation and justification of the specific fees to be imposed, or a convincing argument that the FAA's cost structure is of such efficiency that new fees or taxes are necessary. In addition, the conferees believe there will be substantial savings achieved through the FAA reform provisions enacted in this bill and the broader revisions currently under consideration in the authorization process. Such cost savings, combined with further review of the agency's cost structure, could obviate or minimize the need for additional fees. Amendment No. 45: The conference agreement deletes language proposed by the Senate which would have begun a three year phaseout of the ``five percent bonus pay'' for air traffic controllers and technicians, and inserts new language allowing the Secretary of Transportation permissive transfer authority of up to $60,000,000 from Coast Guard ``Operating expenses'' to augment funding for air traffic control operations and maintenance to enhance safety and security. FAA operations funding and transfer flexibility.--Since consideration of the fiscal year 1996 transportation appropriations bill by the House and Senate, the administration has raised the priority of funding for FAA operations and maintenance. For example, in a September 13, 1995 letter to