Skip to Search Skip to Left Navigation U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) - Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) - United States Department of Transportation (USDOT, US DOT or DOT)
  ABOUT RITA | CONTACT US | PRESS ROOM | CAREERS | SITE MAP
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
Data and Statistics
Bookstore
Programs
About BTS
Upcoming Press Releases
External Links
Intelligent Transportation Systems
National Transportation Library
Research, Development and Technology
Transportation Safety Institute
University Transportation Centers
Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
Printable Version
[From Thomas, a service of the U.S. Congress through its Library.
Check for accuracy before citing or quoting.]


42 275 cc Calendar No. 121 105 th Congress Report SENATE 1st Session 105 55 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 1998 July 22, 1997--Ordered to be printed Mr. Shelby, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany S. 1048] The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1048) making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass. Amounts of new budget (obligational) authority for fiscal year 1998 Amount of bill as reported to Senate $12,610,422,883 Amount of budget estimates, 1998 13,115,727,000 Fiscal year 1997 enacted 11,109,835,396 C O N T E N T S Total obligational authority 4 Salaries and expenses 7 Office of Civil Rights 7 Transportation planning, research, and development 8 Transportation Administrative Service Center 8 Payments to air carriers 9 Rental payments 12 Minority Business Resource Center Program 15 Minority business outreach 15 Operating expenses 21 Acquisition, construction, and improvements 26 Environmental compliance and restoration 32 Port safety development 32 Alteration of bridges 33 Retired pay 33 Reserve training 33 Research, development, test, and evaluation 34 Boat safety 35 Operations 36 Facilities and equipment 44 Research, engineering, and development 65 Grants-in-aid for airports 69 Aircraft Purchase Loan Guarantee Program 83 Limitation on general operating expenses 84 Motor carrier safety operations 85 Highway-related safety grants 90 Federal-aid highways 91 Right-of-way revolving fund 98 Motor carrier safety grants 98 State infrastructure banks 99 Operations and research 101 Highway traffic safety grants 105 Office of the Administrator 108 Railroad safety 110 Railroad research and development 111 Northeast Corridor Improvement Program 114 Railroad Rehabilitation Improvement Program 116 Next generation high-speed rail 116 Alaska railroad rehabilitation 118 Rhode Island rail development 118 Direct loan financing program 119 Grants to National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) 119 Administrative expenses 123 Formula grants 126 University transportation centers 127 Transit planning and research 127 Trust fund share of transit programs 129 Discretionary grants 129 Mass transit capital fund 143 Operations and maintenance 144 Research and special programs 146 Pipeline safety 150 Emergency preparedness grants 152 Salaries and expenses 153 Salaries and expenses 155 Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board: Salaries and expenses 157 National Transportation Safety Board: Salaries and expenses 157 General provisions 160 Compliance with paragraph 7, rule XVI, of the Standing Rules of the Senate 162 Compliance with paragraph 7(c), rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of the Senate 162 Compliance with paragraph 12, rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate 163 Budgetary impact statement 164 TOTAL OBLIGATIONAL AUTHORITY PROVIDED--GENERAL FUNDS AND TRUST FUNDS In addition to the appropriation of $12,610,422,883 in new budget authority for fiscal year 1998, large amounts of contract authority are provided by law, the obligation limits for which are contained in the annual appropriations bill. The principal items in this category are the trust funded programs for Federal-aid highways, for mass transit, and for airport development grants. For fiscal year 1998, estimated obligation limitations total $28,081,300,000. PROGRAM, PROJECT, AND ACTIVITY During fiscal year 1998, for the purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99 177), as amended, with respect to appropriations contained in the accompanying bill, the terms ``program, project, and activity'' shall mean any item for which a dollar amount is contained in appropriations acts (including joint resolutions providing continuing appropriations) or accompanying reports of the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, or accompanying conference reports and joint explanatory statements of the committee of conference. This definition shall apply to all programs for which new budget (obligational) authority is provided, as well as to discretionary grants and discretionary grant allocations made through either bill or report language. In addition, the percentage reductions made pursuant to a sequestration order to funds appropriated for facilities and equipment, Federal Aviation Administration, and for acquisition, construction, and improvements, Coast Guard, shall be applied equally to each budget item that is listed under said accounts in the budget justifications submitted to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations as modified by subsequent appropriations acts and accompanying committee reports, conference reports, or joint explanatory statements of the committee of conference. ISTEA AUTHORIZATIONS EXPIRATION The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act provides authorizations for most Federal highway, transit, and highway safety programs, and most of those authorizations are contract authority. That means they are available for obligation without appropriation. The role of the appropriations process with respect to contract authority programs generally is to set obligation limitations so that overall Federal spending stays within legislated targets and to appropriate liquidating cash to cover the outlays associated with obligations that have been made. ISTEA authorized these Federal surface transportation programs through fiscal year 1997, and the Congress must reauthorize these programs in order to create new contract authority for fiscal year 1998 and later years. The Congress has begun the process to reauthorize ISTEA, but neither the Senate nor the House has passed reauthorization legislation. Until such legislation is enacted, there will not be new contract authority to fund such surface transportation programs as the Federal-aid highway program, transit discretionary grants, or highway safety grants, although any unobligated balances from prior years will carry over and be available for obligation. In developing fiscal year 1998 appropriations legislation for the Federal surface transportation programs authorized by ISTEA, the Committee has generally assumed continuation of current law. If, as the ISTEA reauthorization process moves forward, the Congress decides to make changes to these programs, there may need to be associated changes to the appropriations language for these programs. THE GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS ACT The Government Performance and Results Act [Results Act] requires Federal agencies to develop strategic plans and annual performance plans and reports. The first multiyear strategic plan is due by the end of September 1997. The Committee is fully committed to support the Department as it seeks to implement the requirements of the Results Act. The Committee commends the Department for its aggressive implementation of the Results Act. Performance measures have been identified for most of the Department's major programs, and the Department has briefed staff of this Committee and others on these measures. The Department has distributed a draft strategic plan and invited comments from its stakeholders as part of the consultation process required by law. The draft strategic plan represents a commendable effort that builds on the Department's efforts to identify program performance measures and articulates broad goals and objectives for the array of departmental programs. The Committee is disappointed, however, that the draft plan does not set out priorities among those goals and objectives. Setting priorities among such a broad array of goals and objectives is a challenging and controversial task, but the Committee is convinced that a plan with as many goals and objectives as the Department's draft plan that lacks a priority scheme is, in the end, no plan at all. As OMB Director Raines said in a recent discussion of the Results Act, ``This is an era of fiscal limits. Resources are scarce. Not every priority can be met nor all needs satisfied. Every program must count.'' The Committee, therefore, strongly urges the Secretary to consult with this Committee and others in Congress and the Department's stakeholders, before the strategic plan is finalized, to identify priorities among the Department's goals and objectives. If the Secretary and the Congress agree on the Department's priorities, this Committee can work more effectively with the Department in the appropriations process to ensure resources are allocated in a manner best suited to achieving those priorities. As the Department moves forward with implementation of the Results Act, the Committee understands that revisions and realignments to current budgetary presentations will be likely to ensure consistency with strategic and annual performance plans. The Committee strongly encourages the Department to develop and propose such revisions, and to present any necessary reconciliation and crosswalks, to ensure that fiscal year 1999 and subsequent budget submissions display amounts requested against program activity structures for which annual performance goals and indicators have been established. The Committee further expects that the Department will develop any needed revisions to account and program activity structures in consultation with the Committee on Appropriations and cognizant authorizations committees. TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SALARIES AND EXPENSES Appropriations, 1997 \1\$52,966,000 Budget estimate, 1998 56,136,000 Committee recommendation 66,703,000 \1\Does not include reduction for TASC pursuant to section 321 of Public Law 104 205. Section 3 of the Department of Transportation Act of October 15, 1966 (Public Law 89 670) provides for establishment of the Office of the Secretary of Transportation [OST]. The Office of the Secretary is composed of the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary immediate offices, the Office of the General Counsel, and five assistant secretarial offices for transportation policy, aviation and international affairs, budget and programs, governmental affairs, and administration. These secretarial offices have policy development and central supervisory and coordinating functions related to the overall planning and direction of the Department of Transportation, including staff assistance and general management supervision of the counterpart offices in the operating administrations of the Department. The Committee recommends a total of $66,703,000 for the salaries and expenses of the Office of the Secretary of Transportation including $40,000 for reception and representation expenses. Bill Language User fees .--The Committee has included bill language which permits the Office of the Secretary to credit to this account $1,000,000 in user fees. OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS Appropriations, 1997 \1\$5,574,000 Budget estimate, 1998 5,574,000 Committee recommendation 5,574,000 \1\Does not include reduction for TASC pursuant to section 321 of Public Law 104 205. The Office of Civil Rights is responsible for advising the Secretary on civil rights and equal employment opportunity matters, formulating civil rights policies and procedures for the operating administrations, investigating claims that small businesses were denied certification or improperly certified as disadvantaged business enterprises, and overseeing the Department's conduct of its civil rights responsibilities and making final determinations on civil rights complaints. In addition, the Civil Rights Office is responsible for enforcing laws and regulations which prohibit discrimination in federally operated and federally assisted transportation programs. The Committee has provided a total of $5,574,000 for the Office of Civil Rights. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND DEVELOPMENT Appropriations, 1997 \1\$3,000,000 Budget estimate, 1998 6,008,000 Committee recommendation 4,400,000 \1\Does not include reduction for TASC pursuant to section 321 of Public Law 104 205. The Office of the Secretary performs those research activities and studies which can more effectively or appropriately be conducted at the departmental level. This research effort supports the planning, research and development activities, and systems development needed to assist the Secretary in the formulation of national transportation policies. The program is carried out primarily through contracts with other Federal agencies, educational institutions, nonprofit research organizations, and private firms. The Committee has reduced the administration's request by $1,608,000. The recommended level includes $300,000 for reimbursement to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics [BTS] for services provided by the Office of Aviation Information. These funds should be tendered to BTS in the first quarter of the fiscal year to assist BTS in defraying the costs of providing these and other services to OST. Transportation planning .--The recommended level includes funding for transportation planning assistance for the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City and for a multimodal transportation study for Albuquerque and Santa Fe, NM. Safety standards relating to the use of antihistamines .--With funds appropriated during fiscal years 1996 97, the Department is preparing a 1998 public awareness campaign to combat the effect of fatigue, sleep disorders, and inattention related to motor vehicle crashes. In addition to this important effort, the Committee believes that specific attention must be paid to raising awareness of the potential operator impairment caused by various medications. The Federal Aviation Administration has been very vigilant in its review of medication suitable for use by pilots and safety-related personnel and has approved, for example, the use of certain antihistamines for allergy relief that are nonsedating. The Committee believes that other agencies within the Department, such as NHTSA and the Office of Motor Carriers, should follow the lead of the FAA in this regard. Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary to provide by December 31, 1997, a report detailing his plan to develop safety standards relating to the use of antihistamines in all public/commercial modes of transportation. TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE CENTER Limitation, 1997 \1\($124,812,000) Budget estimate, 1998 ........................... Committee recommendation ........................... \1\Does not reflect reduction pursuant to section 321 of Public Law 104 205. The Transportation Administrative Service Center [TASC] provides a business operation fund for DOT to provide a wide range of administrative services to the Department and other customers. TASC functions as an entrepreneurial and self-sufficient entity and provides competitive quality services responsive to customer needs. The TASC is governed by a Board of Directors composed of customer agencies, operating in a competitive business like environment. The TASC presents proposed operating and financial plans to the Board at the beginning of each fiscal year. Once the Board has approved those plans the TASC provides cost-effective products and services to its full customer base. The Director of TASC provides quarterly performance and financial reports to the Board, makes recommendations for changes to the approved plans and is responsible for the day-to-day management of the TASC. DOT administrations must procure consolidated administrative services from the TASC unless a financial analysis of the services demonstrates that it is more cost beneficial to the Department as a whole--not to an individual operating entity alone--to change the nature of the service delivery (to consolidate a service or to decentralize a service). TASC services are being marketed to customers outside DOT to provide greater economies of scale, thus reducing costs to individual customers. TASC services include: --Functions formerly in DOT's working capital fund [WCF]; --Office of the Secretary [OST] personnel, procurement and information technology support operations; --Systems development staff; --Operations of the consolidated departmental dockets facilities; and --Certain departmental services and administrative operations, such as human resources management programs, transit fare subsidy payments, and employee wellness including substance awareness and testing. All of the services of the TASC will be financed through customer reimbursements, to the extent possible, on a fee-for-service basis. The Committee is directing the Office of the Inspector General to undertake a study and report back to the Committee by April 1, 1998, that evaluates the cost effectiveness of TASC and whether the TASC provides quality services responsive to customer needs. PAYMENTS TO AIR CARRIERS (liquidation of contract authorization) (airport and airway trust fund) Appropriations, 1997 ($25,900,000) Budget estimate, 1998 ........................... Committee recommendation ........................... In fiscal year 1998, this account is being terminated, and remaining contract authority is being rescinded. The Essential Air Service Program is being funded in a new account (essential air service and rural airport improvement fund), reflecting provisions of the Federal Aviation Reauthorization Act of 1996. Many EAS points are located in remote rural areas: 57 of 69 communities served by the Essential Air Service Program are more than 100 highway miles from the nearest small, medium, or large hub airport. Twenty-six more communities are located in Alaska, where, in all but two cases, year-round road access does not exist. Recognizing the critical importance of EAS service to these communities, the Committee intends that service in Alaska not be reduced. Without air service, such communities would be further isolated from the Nation's economic centers. Moreover, businesses are typically interested in locating in areas that have convenient access to scheduled air service. Loss of service would seriously hamper small communities' ability to attract new business or even to retain those they now have, resulting in further strain on local economies and loss of jobs. ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE AND RURAL AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT FUND Appropriations, 1997 ........................... Budget estimate, 1998 (mandatory authority) $50,000,000 Committee recommendation (mandatory authority) 50,000,000 The Essential Air Service [EAS] and Rural Airport Improvement Program provides funds directly to commuter/regional airlines to provide air service to small communities that otherwise would not receive air service and for rural airport improvement as provided by the 1996 Federal Aviation Reauthorization Act. The Federal Aviation Reauthorization Act of 1996 authorizes $100,000,000 in user fees for flights that fly over, but do not land in, the United States. The first $50,000,000 of each year's fees go directly to carry out the Essential Air Service Program and, to the extent not used for essential air service, to improve rural airport safety. The Committee recommendation includes a general provision which would limit the number of communities that receive EAS funding by excluding points in the 48 contiguous United States that are located fewer than 70 highway miles from the nearest large or medium hub airport, or that require a subsidy in excess of $200 per passenger unless such a point is more than 210 miles from the nearest large or medium hub airport. The following table reflects the points currently receiving service and the annual rates as of the end of March 1997: RECENT EAS SUBSIDY DATA\1\ States/communities Estimated mileage to nearest hub (small, medium, or large) Average daily enplanements at EAS point (calendar year 1996) Current annual subsidy rates (June 1, 1997) Subsidy per passenger Arizona: 101 5.8 $155,369 $51.26 Arkansas: 108 7.0 569,344 112.48 California: 234 25.1 151,450 11.58 Colorado: 258 36.4 210,544 31.34 Hawaii: Kamuela 39 3.1 292,061 180.84 Illinois: 126 5.7 182,319 61.62 Iowa: Ottumwa 85 4.0 382,072 181.16 Kansas: 149 10.1 146,225 27.70 Maine: 71 12.0 330,080 52.57 Michigan: 236 21.2 141,363 37.26 Minnesota: 127 (\3\) (\3\) (\3\) Missouri: 138 13.1 108,120 24.02 Montana: 280 6.7 387,540 110.25 Nebraska: 256 2.2 346,863 296.21 Nevada: Ely 237 2.9 508,759 335.37 New Hampshire: Keene 56 5.6 382,283 131.82 New Mexico: 91 12.9 188,923 27.99 New York: 118 9.0 132,540 28.12 North Dakota: 405 15.0 415,506 53.10 Oklahoma: 84 6.0 381,517 121.15 Pennsylvania: Oil City/Franklin 86 25.5 118,373 8.89 South Dakota: 206 (\3\) (\3\) (\3\) Texas: Brownwood 138 4.2 499,109 226.56 Utah: 178 21.8 292,882 25.70 Vermont: Rutland 69 11.9 382,283 61.51 Washington: Ephrata/Moses Lake 108 38.7 177,628 8.78 West Virginia: 173 8.6 270,835 60.36 Wyoming: Worland 164 9.6 155,468 31.01 \1\The above list of communities is based on currently available data, and is subject to change for a number of reasons. Subsidy rates change as their 2-year rate terms expire throughout the year. In addition, air carriers submit passenger traffic data on a quarterly basis. Changes in both subsidy rates and traffic levels will, of course, change subsidy-per-passenger calculations. Further, some communities currently receiving subsidy-free service may require subsidy in the future while some currently subsidized communities may attain profitability and no longer require subsidy. Finally, hub designations are recalculated annually and published by the FAA in the ``Airport Activities Statistics.'' \2\There was an extended service hiatus; thus, no meaningful calculation can be made. \3\No service or subsidy rate in place. PAYMENTS TO AIR CARRIERS (rescission of contract authorization) (airport and airway trust fund) Rescission, 1997 -$12,700,000 Budget estimate, 1998 -38,600,000 Committee recommendation -38,600,000 The Committee has included bill language which would continue the current eligibility criteria for essential air service. In addition, the Department is encouraged to explore establishing dual EAS hubs in Kansas within the eligibility criteria and available funding. RENTAL PAYMENTS Appropriations, 1997 $127,447,000 Budget estimate, 1998 10,567,000 Committee recommendation ........................... In 1996 and 1997 payments to the General Services Administration [GSA] for headquarters and field space rental and related services for all operating administrations were consolidated into this account. Beginning in 1998, the administration proposes that all GSA rental payments be included in the modal budgets. Therefore, the budget request includes funding only for OST utilized space and related services and departmentwide facility security enhancements. The administration believes that decentralized budgeting for rent will encourage the operating administrations to reduce excess space. The Committee includes funding for rent, but has included the funding in the Office of the Secretary salaries and expenses. GSA RENTAL PAYMENTS\1\ [Dollars and square feet in thousands] Administration Fiscal year 1996 enacted\2\ Fiscal year 1996 GSA billings Fiscal year 1997 projected\3\ Fiscal year 1998 request Funding Square feet Funding Square feet Funding Square feet Federal Highway Administration [17,685] [17,112] [18,005] [1,070] 18,275 1,067 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 4,381 4,386 217 4,234 217 Federal Railroad Administration 3,493 4,955 212 2,955 156 Federal Transit Administration 3,237 3,304 152 3,239 153 Federal Aviation Administration 69,431 68,309 4,160 67,024 4,213 U.S. Coast Guard 40,334 36,237 2,363 34,815 2,364 St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation 193 196 9 150 9 Research and Special Programs Administration 2,022 2,077 103 2,075 103 Office of the Inspector General 2,225 2,386 110 2,350 110 Office of the Secretary of Transportation: 12,885 6,381 291 5,898 291 Transportation Administrative Services Center 6,526 321 6,640 321 Bureau of Transportation Statistics 452 587 26 575 26 OST--rental payments to GSA [135,200] [138,653] [135,344] [7,964] ----------- ---------------- ----------- ------------------ --------- ------------- ------- Subtotal 135,200 138,653 135,344 7,964 152,899 9,030 Federal Highway Administration 17,685 17,112 18,005 1,070 ----------- ---------------- ----------- ------------------ --------- ------------- ------- Subtotal, consolidated account 152,885 8,580 155,765 153,349 9,034 Maritime Administration 4,594 298 4,433 4,465 299 4,684 299 ----------- ---------------- ----------- ------------------ --------- ------------- ------- Total, Department of Transportation 157,479 8,878 160,198 157,814 9,333 157,583 9,329 \1\Enacted as a single account under the Office of the Secretary of Transportation. Fiscal years 1996 and 1997 appropriations directed the reimbursement of FHWA GSA rent from FHWA LGOE account to the consolidated account. The fiscal year 1998 budget proposes the termination of the consolidated rent account and the return of funding for space utilized by the operating administrations to their respective budgets \2\Fiscal year 1996 requirements are best represented by the actual billings. There is no distribution by mode of the enacted amounts of $152,885 and 8,580 square feet because they are less than our existing inventory. The shortfall of $3,500,000 for the consolidated account was covered by GSA. \3\Fiscal year 1997 requirements are best represented by the projected billings. There is no distribution by mode of the enacted amounts of $144,741 and 8,580 square feet because they are less than our existing inventory. MINORITY BUSINESS RESOURCE CENTER PROGRAM Appropriations, 1997 $1,900,000 Budget estimate, 1998 1,900,000 Committee recommendation 1,900,000 Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization [OSDBU]/Minority Business Resource Center [MBRC]. --The OSDBU/MBRC provides assistance in obtaining short-term working capital and bonding for disadvantaged, minority, and women-owned businesses [DBE/MBE/WBE's]. In fiscal year 1998, the short-term loan program will focus on the lending of working capital to DBE/MBE/WBE's for transportation-related projects in order to strengthen their competitive and productive capabilities. Since fiscal year 1993, the loan program has been a separate line item appropriation, which reflects the President's budget proposal, which segregated such activities in response to changes made by the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990. The limitation on direct loans under the Minority Business Resource Center is at the administration's requested level of $15,000,000. The Department is projecting that the authorized loan level of $15,000,000 will be reached in fiscal years 1998 and 1999. Of the funds appropriated, $1,500,000 covers the direct subsidy costs for loans not to exceed $15,000,000; and, $400,000 is for administrative expenses to carry out the Direct Loan Program. MINORITY BUSINESS OUTREACH Appropriations, 1997 $2,900,000 Budget estimate, 1998 2,900,000 Committee recommendation 2,900,000 This appropriation provides contractual support to assist minority business firms, entrepreneurs, and venture groups in securing contracts and subcontracts arising out of projects that involve Federal spending. It also provides support to historically black and Hispanic colleges. Separate funding is requested by the administration since this program provides grants and contract assistance that serves DOT-wide goals and not just OST purposes. General Provisions Political and Presidential appointees .--The Committee has included a provision in the bill (sec. 305), which is similar to general provisions that have been included in previous appropriations acts, which limits the number of political and Presidential appointees within the Department of Transportation. The Committee is recommending that the ceiling for fiscal year 1998 be 107 personnel. Advisory committees .--The Committee has included a general provision (sec. 323) which would limit the amount of funds that could be used for the expenses of advisory committees utilized by the Department of Transportation. The limitation specified is $1,000,000, which is $250,000 below that enacted in fiscal year 1997. Minority business outreach program .--The bill includes a provision in the bill (sec. 337) that would allow the repurchase of preferred stock at a rate determined by the Secretary to facilitate the administration of the Minority Business Resource Center Program and to make more funds available for the underlying purposes of the program. Other Reductions in fiscal year 1997 appropriations .--In fiscal year 1997, reductions were made to a number of accounts due to limitations or reductions imposed in various areas, such as the Transportation Administration Services Center, performance awards, and rescissions required by the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997 (Public Law 104 208). In the Senate Committee report, each account head shows the amount appropriated in Public Law 104 205 and Public Law 104 208, before the various reductions were made. The table below depicts the amount of funds appropriated for each of the accounts, and the reductions required. CHANGES IN FISCAL YEAR 1997 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPROPRIATIONS Account Public Law 104 205 Public Law 104 208 Net appropriation Appropriations TASC GP 321 Awards GP 346 Appropriations Rescissions Office of the Secretary: $52,966,000 -$1,458,200 $51,507,800 ---------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- Subtotal -1,553,804 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== U.S. Coast Guard: 2,294,725,000 -2,026,805 -$3,000 2,292,695,195 ---------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- Subtotal -2,026,805 -3,000 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== Federal Aviation Administration: 4,900,000,000 -2,811,301 -176,888 $57,900,000 4,954,911,811 ---------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- Subtotal -2,811,301 -176,888 226,600,000 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== Federal Highway Administration: (20,000,000) ( -9,100,000) (10,900,000) ---------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- Subtotal -2,001,532 -178,512 82,000,000 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: (171,000,000) ( -11,800,000) (159,200,000) ---------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- Subtotal -597,812 -32,000 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== Federal Railroad Administration: 16,739,000 -103,000 -4,000 16,632,000 ---------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- Subtotal -170,979 -15,000 141,180,000 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== Federal Transit Administration: Administrative expenses 41,497,000 -451,135 -4 41,045,861 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation: Operations and maintenance 10,337,000 -12,704 -2,000 10,322,296 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== Research and Special Programs Administration: 26,886,000 -179,100 -3,900 3,000,000 29,703,000 ---------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- Subtotal -279,842 -5,200 3,000,000 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== Office of Inspector General: Salaries and expenses 37,900,000 -94,086 -1,000 37,804,914 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== Bureau of Transportation Statistics\1\ (25,000,000) ( -118,094) ( -36,860) 24,845,046 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== Surface Transportation Board: Salaries and expenses 12,344,000 -100,000 12,244,000 ================ ============== =============== ================ ================ =============== Total reductions, Department of Transportation -10,000,000 -513,604 452,780,000 \1\BTS reductions in parentheses included under Federal-aid highways. Asset sales .--The Coast Guard and FAA, like many other agencies, are reorganizing and downsizing while providing critical services to the public at less cost. The Committee believes that the Coast Guard, the FAA, the FHWA, and the Government as a whole, would benefit substantially if allowed budgetary credit for property they expect to excess as part of downsizing efforts. Clearly, there is the potential for a very positive benefit if the Coast Guard and the FAA are permitted to receive credit for the value of excessed property. Rebates, refunds, and incentive payments .--The Department receives funds from various Government programs at different time intervals (that is, weekly, monthly, quarterly). For example, under the General Services Administration's Travel Management Center [TMC] Program, rebate checks received from the travel contractor are distributed monthly to each element of the Department in proportion to net domestic airline sales arranged by the contractor. Past expenditures have to be analyzed to determine the proper sources to refund which can be a time-consuming process. The staff time and cost associated with the precise accounting for each such refund is prohibitive. To alleviate the need to specifically identify the source for each repayment the language allows a fair and sensible allocation of the rebates and miscellaneous and other funds. Many repayments are received late in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year or in the first quarter of the new fiscal year and thus are not effectively available to the agency for new obligations. For example, rebate checks for September travel are received from the travel management contractor in October. To maintain good financial management incentives and avoid injudicious commitments, this provision would provide specific authority to use rebated funds for program purposes beyond the fiscal year of the appropriation charged for the initial payment. U.S. COAST GUARD SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 1998 PROGRAM The U.S. Coast Guard, as it is known today, was established on January 28, 1915, through the merger of the Revenue Cutter Service and the Lifesaving Service. In 1939, the U.S. Lighthouse Service was transferred to the Coast Guard, followed by the Bureau of Marine Inspection and Navigation in 1942. The Coast Guard has as its primary responsibilities the enforcement of all applicable Federal laws on the high seas and waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; promotion of safety of life and property at sea; assistance to navigation; protection of the marine environment; and maintenance of a state of readiness to function as a specialized service in the Navy in time of war (14 U.S.C. 1, 2). The Committee recommends a total program level of $3,964,731,000 for the activities of the Coast Guard in fiscal year 1998. The following table summarizes the Committee's recommendations: [In thousands of dollars] Program Fiscal year 1997 enacted\1\ Fiscal year 1998 estimate Committee recommendations Operating expenses \2\2,619,725 \3\2,740,000 \2\2,731,700 Acquisition, construction, and improvements 374,840 \4\379,000 \4\412,300 Environmental compliance and restoration 22,000 21,000 21,000 Port safety development 5,000 Alteration of bridges 16,000 26,000 Retired pay 617,284 645,696 653,196 Reserve training 65,890 65,000 65,535 Research, development, test, and evaluation 19,200 19,000 20,000 Boat safety 35,000 55,000 35,000 ----------------------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- Total 3,774,939 3,924,696 3,964,731 \1\Excludes reductions pursuant to sections 321 and 346 of Public Law 104 205. \2\Includes $300,000,000 in Department of Defense Appropriations Act. \3\Includes $300,000,000 from defense discretionary funds. \4\Excludes $9,000,000 in proposed asset sales. OPERATING EXPENSES General Trust Total Appropriations, 1997\1\ $2,594,725,000 $25,000,000 $2,619,725,000 Budget estimate, 1998\2\ 2,715,000,000 25,000,000 2,740,000,000 Committee recommendation\3\ 2,706,700,000 25,000,000 2,731,700,000 \1\Includes $300,000,000 by transfer from the Department of Defense. Excludes reductions for TASC and awards pursuant to sections 321 and 346 of Public Law 104 205. \2\Includes $300,000,000 from defense discretionary funds. \3\Includes $300,000,000 by transfer from the Department of Defense. The ``Operating expenses'' appropriation provides funds for the operation and maintenance of multipurpose vessels, aircraft, and shore units strategically located along the coasts and inland waterways of the United States and in selected areas overseas. The program activities of this appropriation fall into the following categories: Search and rescue. --One of its earliest and most traditional missions, the Coast Guard maintains a nationwide system of boats, aircraft, cutters, and rescue coordination centers on 24-hour alert. Aids to navigation. --To help mariners determine their location and avoid accidents, the Coast Guard maintains a network of manned and unmanned aids to navigation along our coasts and on our inland waterways, and operates radio stations in the United States and abroad to serve the needs of the armed services and marine and air commerce. Marine safety. --The Coast Guard insures compliance with Federal statutes and regulations designed to improve safety in the merchant marine industry and operates a recreational boating safety program. Marine environmental protection. --The primary objectives of this program are to minimize the dangers of marine pollution and to assure the safety of U.S. ports and waterways. Enforcement of laws and treaties. --The Coast Guard is the principal maritime enforcement agency with regard to Federal laws on the navigable waters of the United States and the high seas, including fisheries, drug smuggling, illegal immigration, and hijacking of vessels. Ice operations. --In the Arctic and Antarctic, Coast Guard icebreakers escort supply ships, support research activities and Department of Defense operations, survey uncharted waters, and collect scientific data. The Coast Guard also assists commercial vessels through ice-covered waters. Defense readiness. --During peacetime the Coast Guard maintains an effective state of military preparedness to operate as a service in the Navy in time of war or national emergency at the direction of the President. As such the Coast Guard has primary responsibility for the security of ports, waterways, and navigable waters up to 200 miles offshore. COMMITTEE FUNDING RECOMMENDATION The Committee recommendation for Coast Guard operating expenses is $2,731,700,000, including $25,000,000 from the oilspill liability trust fund and $300,000,000 from the Defense appropriations bill for national security missions. [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1997 enacted\1\ Budget request Committee recommendation Pay and allowances: 1,221,311 1,252,440 1,252,440 ----------------------------- ---------------- -------------------------- Total, pay and allowances 1,591,249 1,635,898 1,635,898 ============================= ================ ========================== Depot level maintenance: 144,276 154,659 154,659 ----------------------------- ---------------- -------------------------- Total, depot level maintenance 375,305 395,990 395,990 ============================= ================ ========================== Operations and support: Area operations and support: Cutters: Medium endurance (WMEC) 17,803 18,939 18,939 High endurance (WHEC) 11,529 11,944 11,944 Polar WAGB's 2,380 2,858 2,858 Area offices 18,062 18,400 18,400 Maintenance and logistics commands 136,137 130,469 122,169 Communication stations 2,236 2,335 2,335 District operations and support: District offices 46,898 47,395 47,395 Groups/bases 67,196 69,112 69,112 Combined group/air station 9,928 10,281 10,281 Air stations 45,373 49,820 49,820 Marine safety offices 9,926 10,104 10,104 Long-range electronic navaids (Loran) 6,283 6,362 6,362 Cutters-WLB's and smaller; Mackinaw 31,761 34,504 34,504 Vessel traffic service [VTS] systems 241 244 244 ----------------------------- ---------------- -------------------------- Total, operations and support 408,365 415,406 407,106 ============================= ================ ========================== Recruiting and training support: 6,767 7,313 7,313 ----------------------------- ---------------- -------------------------- Total, recruiting and training support 67,733 76,275 76,275 ============================= ================ ========================== Coast Guard-wide centralized services and support: Headquarters-managed units: Engineering Logistics Center 8,052 8,157 8,157 Finance center 4,786 4,843 4,843 Human Resources Service and Information Center 1,371 1,391 1,391 Coast Guard yard 2,771 2,846 2,846 National Strike Force 2,099 2,114 2,114 National Pollution Funds Center 1,080 1,118 1,118 Command and Control Engineering Center [C\2\CEN] 2,584 3,522 3,522 Air station Washington, DC 773 871 871 Operations Systems Center [OSC] 7,200 7,229 7,229 Telecommunications/information systems command [TISCOM] 4,116 4,138 4,138 Navigation Center [NAVCENT] 1,896 1,899 1,899 Intelligence Coordination Center [ICC] 189 1,458 1,458 Electronics Engineering Center [EECEN] 2,304 346 346 Coast Guard Institute 968 979 979 Research and Development Center 243 246 246 Coast Guard Personnel Center 957 970 970 National Maritime Center 3,246 3,287 3,287 Centralized bill paying: Postal 6,297 6,431 6,431 FTS 11,544 12,344 12,344 Federal employment compensation 6,486 6,452 6,452 Unemployment compensation 5,250 4,639 4,639 GSA rent 35,748 35,748 ----------------------------- ---------------- -------------------------- Total, Coast Guard-wide centralized services and support 175,043 216,431 216,431 ============================= ================ ========================== Total, accountwide adjustments ================ ========================== ============================= Total appropriation 2,617,695 2,740,000 2,731,700 \1\Includes reduction of $2,030,000 for TASC and awards pursuant to sections 321 and 346 of Public Law 104 205. Note.--Fiscal year 1997 enacted and fiscal year 1998 request includes $300,000,000 provided by transfer from the Department of Defense. PAY AND ALLOWANCES Medical care and equipment .--The Committee has provided the full amount requested for medical care and equipment. The Committee feels that the Coast Guard has done a good job to keep its medical care and equipment line item under budget. OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT Area operations and support Maintenance and logistics commands .--The Committee has provided the amount requested for the maintenance and logistics commands less the caretaker fund requested for Governor's Island. The Committee encourages the Coast Guard to auction the Governor's Island property as quickly as possible. The sale of the Governor's Island facility was anticipated in the budget agreement and the Committee has provided bill language that relieves the Coast Guard from the responsibility for maintaining the property in caretaker status. RECRUITING AND TRAINING SUPPORT The recruiting and training support category has several subsets, including recruiting, training centers (Yorktown, VA; Petaluma, CA; and Cape May, NJ), the Coast Guard Academy, and professional training and education. The Committee has provided $76,275,000 consistent with the budget request. The Committee believes that the Coast Guard has done a good job in trying to hold costs down, and though its budget for professional training and education is sizable, further cuts are not necessary at this time and would undermine the Coast Guard's efforts to recruit and train to meet personnel needs in a streamlined Coast Guard. CENTRALIZED SERVICES AND SUPPORT The centralized services and support line item includes a number of individual activities. The Committee has provided $216,431,000 overall for centralized services and support. The recommendation provides a $41,388,000 increase over the fiscal year 1997 level for this subactivity. BILL LANGUAGE National security .--The Committee's recommendation includes $300,000,000 transferred from the Department of Defense for Coast Guard support of national security activities. The Coast Guard plays a key role in support of military missions under the U.S. Atlantic and Southern Commands in support of drug interdiction missions, refugee and immigration support, and enforcement and joint military training. The Coast Guard is a cost-effective force which is multimissioned. Its ships, aircraft, shore units, and people have four primary roles: maritime safety, maritime law enforcement, marine environmental protection, and national defense. These roles are complementary and contribute to the Coast Guard's unique niche within the national security community. The value of the Coast Guard forces and their mission experience was clearly evident by their active participation in Operations Desert Shield/Storm in the Persian Gulf, and more recently, in operations restore/uphold democracy in Haiti. The Coast Guard is one of the five Armed Forces, and is a full partner on the joint national security team. To be a credible partner, the Coast Guard must maintain a high state of operational readiness. Many parts of the Coast Guard's budget contain funding requests that, if cut, would severely impair the Coast Guard's operational readiness and, therefore, its ability to meet national security commitments. GENERAL PROVISIONS Vessel traffic safety fairway, Santa Barbara/San Francisco .--The Committee has included a general provision (sec. 313) that would prohibit funds to plan, finalize, or implement regulations establishing a vessel traffic safety fairway which is less than 5 miles wide between the Santa Barbara vessel traffic separation scheme and the San Francisco vessel traffic separation scheme. This language has been included in previous appropriations bills. Regulations regarding animal fats and vegetable oils .--The Committee has retained a general provision (sec. 335) that prohibits Coast Guard from using funds to issue, implement, or enforce a regulation that fails to provide for the differences between animal fats, vegetable oils, and other oils. OTHER Mackinaw .--The bill includes the $4,865,000 in requested funding for continued operation and maintenance of the icebreaking cutter Mackinaw during fiscal year 1998. The Committee discourages the administration from pursuing proposals to charge user fees for icebreaking services. Marine Fire and Safety Association .--The Committee remains supportive of efforts by the Marine Fire and Safety Association [MFSA] to provide specialized fire fighting training and maintain an oilspill response contingency plan for the Columbia River. The Committee encourages the Secretary to provide funding for MFSA consistent with the authorization and directs the Secretary to provide $146,500 to continue efforts by the MFSA to provide specialized communications, fire fighting training and equipment, and to implement the oilspill response contingency plan for the Columbia River. Defense readiness .--The Committee has provided the requested $34,300,000 increase in resources for the war on drugs. It should be left to the Commandant's discretion how the drug interdiction funding is to be distributed; however, the Committee believes that this area is perfectly suited for application of performance measures and evaluation of program impacts. Civilian staffing .--The Coast Guard recently provided the Committee with a report analyzing its current personnel management structure to determine whether greater use of civilians would be of benefit to the agency. The report concludes that a military member costs more than a civilian filling the same position; the cost differential representing the premium paid for frontline, rapid-response capability in an operational environment. In the aftermath of completing a major streamlining initiative, the Coast Guard must now conduct military position essentiality review. The report outlines the criteria to be used in such a review, including: deployment, command and control, operations, military skills, jurisdiction of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, statutory requirements, organizational structure, and unusual work hours. The Committee is very interested in the ongoing process of the essentiality review and the results flowing from that effort. The Coast Guard is to be commended for the openness of the report and the Committee encourages the Coast Guard to pursue the essentiality review with the same openness. ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, AND IMPROVEMENTS General Trust Total Appropriations, 1997 $354,840,000 $20,000,000 $374,840,000 Budget estimate, 1998 359,000,000 20,000,000 379,000,000 Committee recommendation 392,300,000 20,000,000 412,300,000 This appropriation provides for the major acquisition, construction, and improvement of vessels, aircraft, shore units, and aids to navigation operated and maintained by the Coast Guard. Currently, the Coast Guard has in operation approximately 250 cutters, ranging in size from 65-foot tugs to 399-foot polar icebreakers, more than 2,000 boats, and an inventory of more than 200 helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. The Coast Guard also operates approximately 600 stations, support and supply centers, communications facilities, and other shore units. The Coast Guard provides over 48,000 navigational aids--buoys, fixed aids, lighthouses, and radio navigational stations. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The following table summarizes the Committee's programmatic recommendations: [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1997 enacted Fiscal year 1998 estimate Committee recommendation Vessels 216,500 186,900 214,700 Aircraft 18,040 26,400 26,400 Other equipment 41,700 49,700 51,200 Shore facilities and aids to navigation 52,350 69,000 73,000 Personnel and related support 46,250 47,000 47,000 -------------------------- --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 374,840 \1\379,000 \1\412,300 \1\Includes $9,000,000 in proposed asset sales. VESSELS The Committee recommends $214,700,000 for vessel acquisition and improvement. The projected allocation of these funds is shown in the table below: VESSELS [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1998 estimate Committee recommendation Acquire vessels and equipment: 55,000 41,000 Repair, renovate, or improve existing vessels and small boats: 3,800 3,800 --------------------------- -------------------------- Total (new program level) 186,900 214,700 The Committee recommends a funding level of $214,700,000 for vessels procurement. This is an increase of $27,800,000 over the budget request. This level of funding is necessary to begin to relieve the out-year pressure on the ACI account due to anticipated replacement of the deepwater fleet. By increasing the procurement of current production vessels, the Coast Guard will realize per unit savings and will create out-year room for anticipated new procurements. In addition, the increased procurement of vessels will provide the Coast Guard with additional flexibility in positioning assets as the Coast Guard moves to a more modern generation of vessels. This flexibility will enable the Coast Guard to better meet its multimission challenges and better deploy a streamlined force. Seagoing buoy tender [WLB] replacement .--The Coast Guard plans to replace its 50-year-old fleet of seagoing buoy tenders with up to 16 new tenders. The request of $55,000,000 for fiscal year 1998 is to pay for the award of the second ship under the full production contract, and to cover additional costs such as spare parts, logistics, and project administration. According to recent estimates, the contract for the first two production ships will be awarded in the second quarter of fiscal year 1998. The Committee is concerned about the growing carryover balances in this program. Last year, the Committee restored much of the House reductions in this account pursuant to the belief that the Coast Guard would be able to obligate a substantial portion of the requested funds. That has not happened. Accordingly, the Committee recommends a reduction of $14,000,000 in the request which can be made up by the $46,564,000 unobligated balance. This program continues to concern the Committee due to the increasing program administration costs, the vacillating sail-away costs, and the current unobligated balance. The Coast Guard estimates the first vessel in the class to have cost $49,400,000, and the second vessel in the class to have cost $29,800,000. Assuming these estimates are accurate, the funds provided are adequate to award a contract in the second quarter of fiscal year 1998 for two vessels if the lower cost is accurate or if the first two vessels under the production contract have similar cost profiles of the first two vessels in the class. Coastal buoy tender [WLM] replacement .--The Committee has provided $21,000,000 for the coastal buoy tender replacement program. This program replaces the Coast Guard's existing 133-foot and 157-foot coastal buoy tenders with 14 new ships. The Coast Guard's request of $21,000,000 for fiscal year 1998 is for economic price adjustments change orders, logistics, and administration. All 14 ships have been ordered. Based on recent information on the 1998 spending plans, it appears that the Coast Guard should have virtually no unobligated carryovers that could be used in fiscal year 1998 against this request. Coastal patrol boat/82-foot WPB replacement .--The Committee has provided $68,100,000 for the coastal patrol boat replacement program, which is a $30,800,000 increase to the amount requested for fiscal year 1998. This program would replace the 82-foot coastal patrol boats which are over 30 years old with 31 new boats. The request for fiscal year 1998 was to procure eight new boats. The Committee recommendation is to procure an additional seven CPB's by exercising existing options which will provide the Coast Guard increased flexibility in asset deployment at an earlier date than under the current procurement schedule. The CPB is one of the more versatile vessels in the Coast Guard inventory and should provide increased flexibility and capability as the Coast Guard transitions from the current fleet mix and recapitalizes the fleet. Stern loading buoy boat replacement project .--The Committee recommendation provides the entire Coast Guard request of $12,000,000 in fiscal year 1998 to procure eight new buoy boats. Mackinaw replacement .--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for concept exploration to refine the specifications and costs for a heavy icebreaking replacement vessel, including a new multimission vessel, for the 53-year-old Mackinaw . While the Committee is pleased that the Commandant has committed to the continued operation of the Mackinaw to maintain heavy icebreaking capabilities on the Great Lakes, the Committee is concerned about the long lead time projected by the Coast Guard to receive a replacement vehicle when the Coast Guard has been studying this issue for a number of years, and projects that a replacement vehicle would not be available until the year 2006. The funding provided in the bill will prevent another year's delay in the acquisition process for a replacement heavy icebreaking vessel. The Committee expects the Coast Guard to issue an interim status report on the concept exploration to the Committee by May 1, 1998. Polar class icebreaker reliability improvement project [RIP] .--The Committee recommends a reduction of $4,000,000 in this program in order that the Coast Guard can effectively manage the reliability improvement project for polar class icebreakers. ATS 1 conversion .--The Committee recommends $13,000,000 for conversion and the addition of a flight deck. AIRCRAFT For aircraft procurement, the Committee recommends $26,400,000 consistent with the budget request. Funds for aircraft acquisitions are distributed as follows: AIRCRAFT [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1998 estimate Committee recommendation Traffic alert and collision avoidance system [TCAS] 3,300 3,300 Global positioning system installation--phase VII, IX 1,900 1,900 HC 130 engine conversion 5,200 5,200 HH 65A helicopter kapton rewiring 3,200 3,200 Long range search aircraft capability preservation 4,600 4,600 HH 65A helicopter mission computer unit replacement 4,400 4,400 HC 130 aircraft sensor upgrade 3,800 3,800 --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 26,400 26,400 OTHER EQUIPMENT The Committee recommends $51,200,000. The following table displays the project allocation: OTHER EQUIPMENT [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1998 estimate Committee recommendation Fleet logistics system [FLS] 9,200 9,200 Ports and waterways safety system [PAWSS] 5,500 5,500 Port security equipment 3,500 Marine information for safety and law enforcement [MISLE] 4,000 4,000 Local notices to mariners [LNM] automation 1,800 1,800 Frequency spectrum reallocation 5,100 5,100 Conversion of software applications 2,000 2,000 Defense message system [DMS] impementation 1,400 1,400 Communication system [COMMSYS] 2000 1,000 1,000 Differential global positioning system [DGPS] (coastal gaps) phase II 1,000 1,000 Personnel management information system/joint uniform military pay system II 1,600 1,600 Aviation logistics management information system [ALMIS] 2,700 2,700 National distress system modernization 7,000 5,000 VHF FM high level site upgrade--phase III 7,400 7,400 --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 49,700 51,200 Ports and waterways safety system [PAWSS] .--The Committee recommends $5,500,000 for the development and implementation of a new ports and waterways safety system [PAWSS], as requested by the administration. The Committee continues to be interested in Coast Guard activities to develop a new approach to navigation safety, with an emphasis on streamlining and reducing the cost of such safety systems. The Committee applauds the Coast Guard's efforts to develop such a system in cooperation with the maritime community and to apply information technology. Personnel management information system .--The Committee has provided the full amount requested. National distress system modernization .--The Committee recommends a reduction of $2,000,000 to $5,000,000. The Committee believes the Coast Guard can complete the activities anticipated for fiscal year 1998 in this program within the reduced funding level. SHORE FACILITIES AND AIDS TO NAVIGATION The program level recommended is $73,000,000. SHORE FACILITIES AND AIDS TO NAVIGATION [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1998 estimate Committee recommendation Shore--General: 6,000 6,000 Groups/bases/stations/MSO's: 4,000 4,000 Aids to navigation facilities: Waterways aids-to-navigation projects 5,000 5,000 OMEGA termination cost 6,700 6,700 Coast Guard District 1--construct Bayonne pier 4,100 4,100 Integrated support command--Portsmount, VA: 4,700 4,700 Asset sales (9,000) (9,000) --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 69,000 73,000 Air Stations Brooklyn and Cape May. --The Committee understands that the Coast Guard has proposed to consolidate Air Station Brooklyn and Air Station Cape May due to improved operational capabilities of its assets which result in budgetary savings. However, the Committee remains concerned about maintaining critically important Coast Guard air rescue response time in the New York City areas at the level currently provided by Air Station Brooklyn during the peak boating season. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Coast Guard to establish and operate a seasonal air facility in the New York City area to provide helicopter rescue capability during the period April 15 through October 15. Kodiak electricity cogeneration .--The Committee encourages the Coast Guard to explore innovative means of assisting the local electrical cooperative from which it purchases power in upgrading its power production capability. PERSONNEL AND RELATED SUPPORT The program level recommended is $47,000,000. Within the amount provided, $500,000 shall be for core acquisition costs. The Committee has provided the full amount requested for AC&I personnel and related support. [In thousands of dollars] Personnel and related support Fiscal year 1998 estimate Committee recommendation Direct personnel costs 46,500 46,500 Core acquisition costs 500 500 --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 47,000 47,000 BILL LANGUAGE Asset sales .--The bill includes a provision which would credit the proceeds from the sale or lease of surplus Coast Guard real property to this appropriation. The administration requested this authority which allows asset sale revenues to be credited to this appropriation as offsetting collections, but limits the amount of offsetting collections in fiscal year 1998 to $9,000,000. Any excess proceeds from asset sales would accrue to the following fiscal year. Accordingly, the Committee encourages the Coast Guard to explore the auction or sale of the Governor's Island facility during fiscal year 1998 with an eye toward supplmenting fiscal year 1999 appropriations. In addition, the bill includes language that protects the Coast Guard from liability for the cost of maintaining Governor's Island. The Coast Guard's closure of Governors Island provides and example of the cost savings attainable by streamlining the agency's infrastructure and the potential significant revenue available to the Coast Guard and the rest of the Federal Government by selling nonessential or noncritical, high-value assets. The Committee would also like to know about additional properties of high value in the Coast Guard's real property portfolio; therefore, the Coast Guard is directed to submit to the Committee by April 2, 1998, a list of its 25 most valuable properties. This list should include information on the fair market value of each property (or an estimate thereof), the amount of land and the number of buildings, the current use being made of the property, and the annual operating costs for the activities housed on each property. The Coast Guard needs funding it can depend upon to carry out necessary projects. The Senate supports the authority vested in the Commandant which allows the sale of real property and specified operational assets, with proceeds to be credited to the ``Acquisition, construction, and improvements'' appropriation. Pier space use agreement .--The bill includes language that allows the Secretary of Transportation, acting through the Commandant of the Coast Guard, to enter into a long-term use agreement with the city of Unalaska for dedicated pier space on the municipal dock. This authority is necessary to support Coast Guard vessels when such vessels call on the Port of Dutch Harbor, AK. The terms and conditions of the use agreement shall be develop by the Secretary and the city of Unalaska. New York search and rescue capability .--The Committee directs the Department of Defense to provide facilities including runway; hangar; fire crash and rescue; and support spaces at the Air National Guard site at the Francis S. Gabreski Airport, Hampton, Long Island, NY, to the Coast Guard. This facility will provide seasonal search and rescue capability during the period April 15 through October 15. Support spaces will consist of suitable operations, berthing, and maintenance spaces. General provisions .--The Committee has included a general provision directing the transfer of the U.S.N.S. Edenton to the Coast Guard. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND RESTORATION Appropriations, 1997 $22,000,000 Budget estimate, 1998 21,000,000 Committee recommendation 21,000,000 The Committee recommends funding of $21,000,000 to continue the environmental restoration and compliance-related actions throughout the Coast Guard. These fiscal year 1998 funds will be used to address environmental problems at former and current Coast Guard units as required by applicable Federal, State, and local environmental laws and regulations. Planned expenditures for these funds include major upgrades to petroleum and regulated-substance storage tanks, restoration of contaminated ground water and soils, remediation efforts at hazardous substance disposal sites, and initial site surveys and actions necessary to bring Coast Guard shore facilities and vessels into compliance with environmental laws and regulations. ISC Kodiak remediation funding .--The investigation and potential cleanup of 34 sites on ISC Kodiak, as per the 1990 Resources Conservation Recovery Act consent order, goes well. Eight of these sites have been closed and eight other sites have been approved for no further action status. Due to reduced levels of contamination anticipated, lower than expected costs to meet consent order milestones, and successful ongoing milestone negotiations with the regulatory bodies, annual requirements for this project have been reduced from past levels of $4,400,000 to $5,400,000 to about $3,000,000 to $3,500,000. Given overall budget constraints and other demands placed on the ``Environmental compliance and restoration'' appropriation, these levels will be adequate to continue this remediation effort in fiscal year 1998. PORT SAFETY DEVELOPMENT Appropriations, 1997 $5,000,000 Budget estimate, 1998 ........................... Committee recommendation ........................... This appropriation provided funds in 1996 and 1997 for the reduction of debt incurred by the Port of Portland, OR, from prior infrastructure development. No funds are requested for 1998. ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Appropriations, 1997 $16,000,000 Budget estimate, 1998 ........................... Committee recommendation 26,000,000 The ``Alteration of bridges'' appropriation provides funds for the Coast Guard's share of the cost of altering or removing bridges obstructive to navigation. Under the provisions of the Truman-Hobbs Act of June 21, 1940, as amended (33 U.S.C. 511 et seq.), the Coast Guard, as the Federal Government's agent, is required to share with owners the cost of altering railroad and publicly owned highway bridges which obstruct the free movement of navigation on navigable waters of the United States in accordance with the formula established in 33 U.S.C. 516. The Committee directs that, of the funds provided, $5,000,000 shall be allocated to the Sand Island Road Tunnel in Honolulu, HI, $3,000,000 shall be allocated to the Florida Avenue railroad/highway combination bridge in New Orleans, LA, and $18,000,000 shall be allocated to the Sidney Lanier highway bridge in Brunswick, GA. RETIRED PAY Appropriations, 1997 $617,284,000 Budget estimate, 1998 645,696,000 Committee recommendation 653,196,000 The ``Retired pay'' appropriation provides for retired pay of military personnel of the Coast Guard and Coast Guard Reserve, members of the former Lighthouse Service, and for annuities payable to beneficiaries of retired military personnel under the retired serviceman's family protection plan (10 U.S.C. 1431 1446) and survivor benefit plan (10 U.S.C. 1447 1455), and for medical care of retired personnel and their dependents under the Dependents Medical Care Act. The average number of personnel on the retired rolls is estimated to be 31,279 in fiscal year 1998, as compared with an estimated 30,433 in fiscal year 1997 and 29,650 in fiscal year 1996. The bill includes $653,196,000 for retired pay, consistent with the budget request, adjusted by $6,100,000 to annualize fiscal year 1997 supplemental funding. This is scored as a mandatory appropriation in the congressional budget process. In addition, this funding level includes $1,400,000 in anticipation of congressional action to extend partial veteran benefits to Merchant Mariners who served between August 16, 1945, and December 31, 1946. The Committee recommends the additional funds for the Coast Guard to process up to 50,000 applications in fiscal year 1998. RESERVE TRAINING Appropriations, 1997 $65,890,000 Budget estimate, 1998 65,000,000 Committee recommendation 65,535,000 Under the provisions of 14 U.S.C. 145, the Secretary of Transportation is required to adequately support the development and training of a Reserve force to ensure that the Coast Guard will be sufficiently organized, manned, and equipped to fully perform its wartime missions. The purpose of the Reserve training program is to provide trained units and qualified persons for active duty in the Coast Guard in time of war or national emergency, or at such other times as the national security requires. Coast Guard reservists must also train for mobilization assignments that are unique to the Coast Guard in times of war, such as port security operations associated with the Coast Guard's Maritime Defense Zone [MDZ] mission and include deployable port security units. The Committee has provided $65,535,000 for Reserve training. The amount provided is $535,000 above the President's request. The Coast Guard is provided Reserve training funding as follows: [In thousands of dollars] Functional program element Fiscal year 1997 levels President's request (7,600 SELRES) Committee recommendation (8,000 SELRES) Drill pay and benefits 26,763 26,203 26,763 Full-time support personnel 20,904 21,013 21,013 Annual training program 11,665 11,467 11,467 District administration/training 2,315 2,250 2,250 Recruiting 2,051 2,066 2,066 O/M support to training facilities 1,532 1,316 1,316 Headquarters administration 660 685 660 ------------------------- ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- Total 65,890 65,000 65,535 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION General Trust Total Appropriations, 1997 $14,180,000 $5,020,000 $19,200,000 Budget estimate, 1998 15,500,000 3,500,000 19,000,000 Committee recommendation 16,500,000 3,500,000 20,000,000 The Coast Guard's Research and Development Program seeks to improve the tools and techniques with which Coast Guard carries out its varied operational missions and to increase the knowledge base upon which it depends to fulfill its regulatory responsibilities. The bill includes $20,000,000 for research, development, test, and evaluation, which is $1,000,000 above the budget request. The Committee recommendation for funding distribution is as follows: [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1997 Fiscal year 1998 estimate Committee recommendation Program areas: 1,872 1,875 1,875 ------------------ --------------------------- -------------------------- Total 19,200 19,000 20,000 The Committee has made a slight adjustment to the fiscal year 1998 request for research and development. In the marine environmental protection area, the Committee has provided the amount requested for the aquatic nuisance species program, which is $1,529,000 and increased the funding for this activity by $1,000,000 to further research effects into a nonchemical interim ballast management practice for fully loaded vessels to prevent the ballast-mediated transfer of species. This research should focus in particular on vessels reporting no ballast on board [NOBOB]. In addition, this funding is also intended to assist the Coast Guard's other efforts consistent with the National Invasive Species Act. BOAT SAFETY (aquatic resources trust fund) Appropriations, 1997 $35,000,00006 Budget estimate, 1998\1\ (55,000,000) Committee recommendation 35,000,00006 \1\The President's budget proposed, contingent on enactment of legislation, that $55,000,000 be available as a direct (mandatory) program and no discretionary funds. This account provides financial assistance for a coordinated National Recreational Boating Safety Program for the several States. Title 46, United States Code, section 13106, establishes a ``Boat safety'' account from which the Secretary may allocate and distribute matching funds to assist in the development, administration, and financing of qualifying State programs. The ``Boat safety'' account consists of amounts transferred from the highway trust fund which are derived from the motorboat fuel tax (18.4 cents per gallon). The President's budget requests no discretionary funding in 1998. Instead, the President's budget proposes to provide all funding for the State boating safety grant program by providing $35,000,000 from the aquatic resources trust fund, together with $20,000,000 from the 7E``Sport fish restoration'' account as authorized under the Clean Vessel Act of 1992 (title V of the Oceans Act of 1992). The Committee cannot support the administration's proposal to convert this program to mandatory spending. After highway fatalities, recreational boating accidents result in the highest number of transportation fatalities annually. The number of boats is increasing each year and the National Transportation Safety Board continues to list boating safety as one of the areas most in need of safety improvement. Annual congressional review and guidance is necessary for timely implementation of boating safety initiatives. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 1998 PROGRAM The Federal Aviation Administration traces its origins to the Air Commerce Act of 1926, but more recently to the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 which established the independent Federal Aviation Agency from functions which had resided in the Airways Modernization Board, the Civil Aeronautics Administration, and parts of the Civil Aeronautics Board. FAA became an administration of the Department of Transportation on April 1, 1967, pursuant to the Department of Transportation Act (October 15, 1966). The total recommended program level for the FAA for fiscal year 1998 amounts to $9,179,154,883 including $50,000,000 in user fees credited to the ``Operations'' appropriation and a $1,700,000,000 obligation limitation on the use of contract authority for the Airport Grants Program. The following table summarizes the Committee's recommendations: [In thousands of dollars] Program Fiscal year 1997 enacted Fiscal year 1998 budget estimate Committee recommendation Operations \1\4,957,900 5,086,100 5,375,900 User fees: \2\(75,000) -50,000 -50,000 Facilities and equipment 1,937,700 1,875,000 1,889,005 Research, engineering, and development 208,412 200,000 214,250 Grants-in-aid for airports\4\ 1,460,000 1,000,000 1,700,000 National Civil Aviation Review Commission 2,400 -------------------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------- Total 8,491,412 8,411,100 9,129,155 \1\Excludes reductions for TASC and awards pursuant to sections 321 and 346 of Public Law 104 205. \2\Reflects maximum amount provided in Public Law 104 205. FAA estimates collections of only $20,000,000 in fiscal year 1997. \3\Proposed user fees. \4\Limitation on obligations. OPERATIONS General Trust User fees Total Appropriations, 1997 $3,182,500,000 $1,700,400,000 $75,000,000 $4,957,900,000 Budget estimate, 1998 1,611,100,000 3,425,000,000 350,000,000 5,386,100,000 Committee recommendation 3,424,272,000 1,901,628,000 50,000,000 5,375,900,000 FAA's ``Operations'' appropriation provides funds for the operation, maintenance, communications, and logistic support of the air traffic control and navigation systems and activities. It also covers the administration and management of the regulatory, airports, commercial space, medical and engineering, and development programs. User fees. --The administration proposed collecting $400,000,000 in user fees in fiscal year 1998. Of these fees, $100,000,000 is available without Appropriations Committee action, including $50,000,000 for the essential air service program and rural airport safety and $50,000,000 for FAA expenses. The bill includes a total of $5,325,900,000 for the operations activities of the Federal Aviation Administration, of which $1,901,628,000 shall be derived from the airport and airway trust fund. An additional $50,000,000 for FAA operations will be derived from user fees. As in past years, FAA is directed to report immediately to the Committees on Appropriations in the event resources are insufficient to operate a safe and effective air traffic control system. The activities of the operations accounts comprise eight main areas consistent with FAA's reorganization to bring together functions and activities that support the provision of a single, major service and to establish a single executive responsible for that service. Air traffic services. --The operations and maintenance of the national air traffic control and navigation system and the installation of air traffic and navigation equipment. Air traffic services consists of five subactivities: air traffic, NAS logistics, systems maintenance, leased telecommunications, and flight inspections. Aviation regulation and certifications.-- Promotes aviation safety and ensures compliance with safety and certification standards for air carriers, commercial operators, air agencies, airmen, and civil aircraft, including aircraft registration; develops and administers safety standards for airworthiness of aircraft and components. Includes accident investigation, aviation medicine, aviation rulemaking, and the suspected unapproved parts office. Civil aviation security .--Provides for the overall planning, direction, management, evaluation, and enforcement of civil aviation security; supports efforts covering the investigation and interdiction of illegal drugs and the assessment of foreign airports. Research and acquisition.-- Responsible for all research, prototyping, system development, and acquisition activities. Includes the William J. Hughes Technical Center. Administration of airports. --Provides for the administration of airport grants and the safety inspection and certification of the Nation's airports. Commercial space transportation. --Facilitates and promotes commercial space launches by the U.S. private sector and licenses and regulates commercial launches, launch site operations, and certain payloads. Administration. --Funds the administrative functions that establish policy and direct and develop programs in the areas of FAA aircraft use and management, building space management, budget and accounting, business information and consultation, human resource management, and technical and management training; includes the regional administrators and the Aeronautical Center Director. Staff offices. --Funds the Office of the Administrator and the Deputy Administrator, and offices that report directly to the Administrator and provide executive direction; operations and communications control; civil rights; government and industry affairs; policy, planning, and international aviation; legal counsel; and public affairs. The following table summarizes the Committee's recommendation in comparison to the budget estimate: [In thousands of dollars] Fiscal year 1997 program level\1\ Fiscal year 1998 budget estimate Committee recommendations Air traffic services 3,801,353 4,192,516 4,181,916 Aviation regulation and certification 501,921 613,768 614,168 Aviation security 114,360 98,651 98,651 Research and acquisition 85,767 92,858 92,858 Administration of airports 45,051 48,052 48,052 Commercial space transportation 6,040 6,182 6,182 Administration 330,044 262,143 262,143 Staff offices 70,376 71,930 71,930 Accountwide adjustments ---------------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------------------------- Total 4,954,912 5,386,100 5,375,900 =================================== ================================== =========================== User fees 350,000 50,000 Appropriated funds 5,036,100 5,325,900 ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------- Total available funds 5,386,100 5,375,900 \1\Includes reduction for TASC and awards pursuant to sections 321 and 346 of Public Law 104 205. AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES The Committee recommends a total of $4,181,916,000 for the operation and maintenance of the national air traffic control and flight service system. This is $10,600,000 less than the budget estimate, but $380,563,000 above the fiscal year 1997 level. Over the next decade, the Committee expects to see the billions of dollars of new technology being developed, procured, and implemented under the ``Facilities and equipment'' account--computers, communications equipment, and information analysis capability--reflected in a projected trend toward more productive work forces and, therefore, lower operations budget estimates. The major activities include: Air traffic. --The Committee recommends $2,536,258,000 and 24,581 FTE's. The Committee's recommendation provides a net increase of 500 additional air traffic controllers as request by the administration. -- Equipment and staffing deficiencies in the New York/New Jersey region .--The Committee continues to be concerned with the shortage of adequately trained air traffic controllers as well as persistent problems with air traffic control equipment at the FAA's air traffic facilities in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area. These staffing shortages and equipment outages have resulted in increased delays and inefficiencies that have placed an inordinate amount of pressure on the overtaxed FAA work force, the air carriers serving the region, as well as the flying public. The Subcommittee on Transportation held a special hearing on this topic on June 12, 1997, during which testimony was received from Members of Congress as well as representatives of the FAA, air carriers, the air traffic controllers, and technicians unions. The hearing served to highlight the urgent need for the FAA to expedite staffing of its facilities in the New York/New Jersey area so that they meet or exceed authorized staffing levels. It also highlighted the failure of the FAA to fully utilize all the tools at its disposal, including the tools granted under its personnel reform authorities, to alleviate critical staffing shortages at these facilities as expeditiously as possible. Finally, the hearing highlighted the need for the FAA to expedite the installation of upgraded and new air traffic control equipment in order to expedite the replacement of outdated equipment and assist the air traffic controllers and air carriers serving the region in handling growing volumes of air traffic, especially during inclement weather. The Committee is pleased with the FAA's progress over the past year in increasing the staffing levels at area towers, the New York TRACON and the New York center. However, the Committee directs the Administrator to meet the authorized staffing levels for all facilities in the New York/New Jersey region by the dates identified in the pending agreements with the pertinent employee organizations. The Administrator is further directed to inform the Committee immediately if it appears that those deadlines will not be met. The Committee further requests the Administrator to use all tools at his or her disposal to rectify the ongoing problems highlighted during the special hearing held by the Transportation Subcommittee. -- Contract tower program .--The Committee recommends $43,700,000 for the contract tower program, as requested by the administration, and directs FAA to study traffic at the airports in New Bern and Hickory, NC, and at the Salisbury/Wicomico County Regional Airport in Maryland, and, if those airports meet or are projected to meet FAA's benefit/cost criteria for tower operations within the next 2 years or if tower operation could be justified under a cost-sharing arrangement, directs FAA to open contract towers at those airports for service during fiscal year 1998. The Committee is aware that FAA has notified 22 airports around the Nation that the FAA will withdraw funding for towers at those airports in 2 years unless the benefit/cost ratio at those airports exceeds 1.0 by the end of 1998. The Committee is concerned about the impacts loss of tower service would have at these 22 airports and will monitor developments with respect to these airports. The Committee urges FAA to work with the communities to explore alternatives, such as sharing of the tower operating costs, to maintain tower operations if the benefit/ cost criteria are unlikely to be satisfied at any of these airports by the end of 1998. National airspace system logistics support. --The Committee recommends $180,833,000 for this subactivity including 1,188 FTE's. The funding provided for the national airspace system logistics support activity is the full amount requested by the administration for fiscal year 1998. Maintenance of air traffic control system. --The Committee recommends $1,064,545 and 9,505 FTE's for this budget subactivity, as requested by the administration. For the reasons discussed below, the Committee has concluded that FAA is likely to continue to underutilize its radio communications link [RCL] network in favor of leased telecommunications. The Committee suggests that FAA accommodate the $4,000,000 reduction by disposing of a part of its underutilized RCL network and taking staffing savings. Leased telecommunication services. --The Committee recommends $343,339,000 for this budget subactivity. This is a reduction of $4,000,000 from the request level. FAA's leased telecommunications request for fiscal year 1998 ($347,339,000) represents a $17,077,000 increase over the fiscal year 1997 level. In the report accompanying last year's appropriation bill, the Committee expressed concern about underutilization of the radio communications link [RCL], which is owned by FAA and is one of the largest microwave networks in the country. The alternative to increased use of the RCL is increased reliance on leased telecommunications costs for the use of private networks. The Committee directed FAA to transfer to the radio communications link as much of the existing workload as possible to better utilize that resource. The Committee understands that FAA plans to use an additional 2,300 to 2,900 RCL circuits rather than leasing circuits from a private vendor. Even if FAA adopts this plan, it would still only be utilizing 56 to 61 percent of its analog circuits and still have a significant amount of digital capacity sitting idle. Given that FAA will apparently continue to underutilize the RCL and prefers leased telecommunications links, the Committee is recommending a reduction of $4,000,000 from the request for the systems maintenance subactivity. Satellite communications technology .--The Committee has added $400,000 to the air traffic activity to provide a low-earth orbit [LEO] satellite communication system at Anchorage, AK, to augment present communications systems. Extensive areas of Alaska are not within present radio coverage. The LEO system will be available for widespread use in Alaska within 2 years, and the Committee anticipates