Skip to Search Skip to Left Navigation U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) - Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) - United States Department of Transportation (USDOT, US DOT or DOT)
  ABOUT RITA | CONTACT US | PRESS ROOM | CAREERS | SITE MAP
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
Data and Statistics
Bookstore
Programs
About BTS
Upcoming Press Releases
External Links
Intelligent Transportation Systems
National Transportation Library
Research, Development and Technology
Transportation Safety Institute
University Transportation Centers
Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
Printable Version

Performance Measures: Northwest Airlines Compared to All Network Carriers

2006

Excel | CSV

  Alaska Network** Carrier Average Northwest's 2006 Rank Among 7 Network Carriers Comment
Measure 1: System Operating Profit/(Loss) per Originating Passenger in Dollars $25.12 $12.56 2 All of the network carriers except Delta and Alaska exceeded the profitability per originating passenger of Southwest
Measure 2: System Operating Expenses (excluding Regional Jet Contract) per Originating Passenger in Dollars $326 $321 2 The network carriers' aggressive downsizing in operations reduced costs that help offset the parallel rise in fuel expense. Delta's costs rose $43 per passenger.
Measure 3: System Operating Expenses (excluding Regional Jet Contract) per Aircraft in Millions of Dollars $27.205 $29.409 3 Operating costs per aircraft rose for all the network carriers except United. Delta's rose the most - $2.7 million per aircraft.
Measure 4: Passenger Revenue per Originating Passenger (excluding Regional Jet Contract Revenue) in dollars $292 $293 3 Benefiting from the fare increases of the past 15 months, only American and Northwest had less passenger revenue per originating passenger in 2006 than in 2001. Delta had $55 more revenue per passenger.
Measure 5: Full-Time Equivalent Employees* per Aircraft 82 103 2 United, American and Delta reported the most FTEs per aircraft. Continental and Delta had the least improvement from 2001 to 2006.
Measure 6: Average Monthly Available Seat-Miles (ASMs) per Full-Time Equivalent Employee* in millions of ASMs 235 218 1 Delta generated 250 million ASMs per FTE, the most of any network carrier and showed the most improvement, 58 percent, from 2001 to 2006.
Measure 7: Average Monthly Revenue Aircraft Minutes per Full-Time Equivalent Employee* in Minutes 176 162 4 The network carriers improved by 40 percent but the low-cost carrier group has a wide advantage over the network airlines in average monthly revenue air minutes per FTE.
Measure 8: Average Monthly Originating Passengers per Full-Time Equivalent Employee* 85 75 3 The network carriers improved performance by 59 percent from 2001 to 2006.
Measure 9: Fuel Cost in Dollars per Originating Passenger $107 $98 2 The network airlines' fuel cost per originating passenger more than doubled in 2006 to $91 per passenger from $39 in 2001. Delta's increase of $66 per passenger was the most of any airline.
Measure 10: Average Full-Time Equivalent Employee* Compensation (Salaries + Benefits) per Originating Passenger in dollars $90 $95 4 The network carrier group reduced labor expense per originating passenger by $41 from 2001 to 2006. Delta cut costs by $26 per passenger.
Measure 11: Average Annual Full-Time Equivalent Employee* Compensation (Salaries + Benefits) in dollars $91,618 $85,310 1 From 2001 to 2006, low-cost carrier annual compensation costs rose 40 percent while network airline costs were up a more modest 8 percent.

Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics

* Full-time Equivalent Employee (FTE) calculations count two part-time employees as one full-time employee.

** Network carriers operate a significant portion of their flights using at least one hub where connections are made for flights on a spoke system.

*** Low-cost carriers are those that the industry recognizes as operating under a low-cost business model, with fewer infrastructure costs and greater expectations of productivity.