Table 9: Comparison of Forecast Accuracy: Results of the Diebold-Mariano (DM) and Modified Diebold-Mariano (DM*) Tests for the Square Loss Function and Several Forecast Horizons
Forecasting Period: 2000-2002
Excel | CSV
| h = 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DM |
-1.34 |
-0.57 |
-1.04 |
-2.32 |
0.23 |
-0.69 |
| DM* |
-1.32 |
-0.56 |
-1.02 |
-2.30 |
0.22 |
-0.68 |
| h = 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DM |
-2.89 |
1.8 |
0.37 |
-2.08 |
0.60 |
-3.52 |
| DM* |
-2.38 |
1.48 |
0.31 |
-1.71 |
0.49 |
-2.90 |
| h = 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DM |
-1.73 |
2.78 |
1.51 |
-2.96 |
-0.03 |
-3.03 |
| DM* |
-0.93 |
1.50 |
0.62 |
-1.56 |
-0.02 |
-1.64 |
Key: Bold indicates statistical difference between the two forecasting methods for alpha = 0.05. Positive (negative) values indicates that the DHR performs better (worse) than the causal model.
|