 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Arkansas: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
462 |
2,079 |
3,005 |
8,868 |
| Very good |
2 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
89 |
644 |
676 |
219 |
| Fair |
72 |
1,255 |
2,188 |
4,007 |
| Mediocre |
166 |
155 |
133 |
3,251 |
| Poor |
133 |
16 |
8 |
1,391 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
19 |
31 |
22 |
2 |
| Fair |
16 |
60 |
73 |
45 |
| Mediocre |
36 |
7 |
4 |
37 |
| Poor |
29 |
1 |
0 |
16 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
