 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Hawaii: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
N |
N |
3 |
4 |
7 |
| Very good |
N |
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
N |
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Fair |
N |
N |
2 |
1 |
1 |
| Mediocre |
N |
N |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Poor |
N |
N |
1 |
3 |
4 |
(Percent)
| Total |
N |
N |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
N |
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
N |
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Fair |
N |
N |
67 |
25 |
14 |
| Mediocre |
N |
N |
0 |
0 |
29 |
| Poor |
N |
N |
33 |
75 |
57 |
KEY FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: N = data do not exist.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
