 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Kansas: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
175 |
126 |
217 |
92 |
17 |
| Very good |
5 |
18 |
17 |
32 |
5 |
| Good |
82 |
45 |
75 |
1 |
0 |
| Fair |
68 |
52 |
95 |
13 |
12 |
| Mediocre |
19 |
10 |
19 |
45 |
0 |
| Poor |
1 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
3 |
14 |
8 |
35 |
29 |
| Good |
47 |
36 |
35 |
1 |
0 |
| Fair |
39 |
41 |
44 |
14 |
71 |
| Mediocre |
11 |
8 |
9 |
49 |
0 |
| Poor |
1 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
