 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Minnesota: 2000
Excel | CSV
| Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
231 |
142 |
521 |
2,084 |
1,504 |
| Very good |
42 |
21 |
65 |
102 |
13 |
| Good |
125 |
63 |
222 |
659 |
223 |
| Fair |
45 |
58 |
215 |
971 |
634 |
| Mediocre |
19 |
0 |
13 |
230 |
215 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
6 |
122 |
419 |
| Not reported |
0 |
0 |
35 |
N |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
18 |
15 |
12 |
5 |
1 |
| Good |
54 |
44 |
43 |
32 |
15 |
| Fair |
19 |
41 |
41 |
47 |
42 |
| Mediocre |
8 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
14 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
28 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement
roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface
condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on
other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions,
tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
