Table 1-5: Missouri Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban,,,,,, (Miles),,,,,, ,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000 Interstate (total reported),368,369,370,371,370,371 Very good ,4,4,5,1,0,0 Good,93,94,104,51,47,47 Fair,153,153,126,128,119,99 Mediocre ,102,102,112,163,175,186 Poor,16,16,23,28,29,39 Not reported,0,0,0,0,0,0 Other freeways and expressways (total reported),254,259,270,314,313,314 Very good ,0,0,0,0,0,0 Good,23,24,25,29,21,20 Fair,201,202,210,206,213,182 Mediocre ,21,23,28,66,73,82 Poor,9,10,7,13,6,30 Not reported,28,29,18,5,6,6 Other principal arterial (total reported),634,639,653,669,670,674 Very good ,0,0,1,0,0,0 Good,40,42,49,27,21,19 Fair,413,417,391,399,363,314 Mediocre ,123,122,149,164,174,169 Poor,58,58,63,79,112,172 Not reported,475,476,466,377,384,379 Urban minor arterial (total reported),N,N,N,N,N,498 Very good ,N,N,N,N,N,0 Good,N,N,N,N,N,9 Fair,N,N,N,N,N,198 Mediocre ,N,N,N,N,N,197 Poor,N,N,N,N,N,94 Not reported,N,N,N,N,N,N Urban collector (total reported),N,N,N,N,N,10 Very good ,N,N,N,N,N,0 Good,N,N,N,N,N,0 Fair,N,N,N,N,N,4 Mediocre ,N,N,N,N,N,4 Poor,N,N,N,N,N,2 Not reported,N,N,N,N,N,N KEY: N = data do not exist.,,,,,, "NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.",,,,,, "NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting. ",,,,,, "SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.",,,,,,