 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Nebraska: 2000
Excel | CSV
| Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
437 |
2,712 |
4,213 |
3,127 |
| Very good |
215 |
581 |
1,013 |
415 |
| Good |
72 |
1,046 |
1,507 |
627 |
| Fair |
39 |
901 |
1,268 |
280 |
| Mediocre |
78 |
143 |
273 |
1,218 |
| Poor |
33 |
41 |
152 |
587 |
| Not reported |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
49 |
21 |
24 |
13 |
| Good |
16 |
39 |
36 |
20 |
| Fair |
9 |
33 |
30 |
9 |
| Mediocre |
18 |
5 |
6 |
39 |
| Poor |
8 |
2 |
4 |
19 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement
roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface
condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on
other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions,
tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
