 |
 |
 |
 |
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Nevada: 2000
(Miles)
Excel | CSV
| Graphic Version
| Total |
479 |
1,377 |
718 |
2,139 |
| Very good |
132 |
139 |
95 |
42 |
| Good |
260 |
622 |
278 |
576 |
| Fair |
47 |
591 |
334 |
1,010 |
| Mediocre |
31 |
25 |
11 |
412 |
| Poor |
9 |
0 |
0 |
99 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
28 |
10 |
13 |
2 |
| Good |
54 |
45 |
39 |
27 |
| Fair |
10 |
43 |
47 |
47 |
| Mediocre |
6 |
2 |
2 |
19 |
| Poor |
2 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement
roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface
condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on
other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions,
tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |