 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in New York: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
925 |
1,833 |
4,121 |
51 |
| Very good |
115 |
102 |
81 |
0 |
| Good |
507 |
1,139 |
1,874 |
46 |
| Fair |
134 |
527 |
2,012 |
5 |
| Mediocre |
96 |
39 |
154 |
0 |
| Poor |
73 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
12 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
| Good |
55 |
62 |
45 |
90 |
| Fair |
14 |
29 |
49 |
10 |
| Mediocre |
10 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
| Poor |
8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
