 |
|
|
|
Table 1-5: North Dakota Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban
(Miles)
Excel | CSV
| Interstate (total reported) |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
| Very good |
0 |
0 |
13 |
14 |
14 |
10 |
| Good |
5 |
9 |
18 |
17 |
20 |
15 |
| Fair |
17 |
17 |
9 |
9 |
4 |
8 |
| Mediocre |
18 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
| Poor |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Not reported |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Other freeways and expressways (total
reported) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Very good |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Fair |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Mediocre |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Not reported |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Other principal arterial (total reported) |
151 |
151 |
163 |
164 |
163 |
164 |
| Very good |
2 |
2 |
6 |
7 |
9 |
4 |
| Good |
9 |
14 |
36 |
38 |
37 |
32 |
| Fair |
75 |
73 |
75 |
72 |
74 |
86 |
| Mediocre |
36 |
33 |
22 |
23 |
21 |
30 |
| Poor |
29 |
29 |
24 |
24 |
22 |
12 |
| Not reported |
13 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Urban minor arterial (total reported) |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
16 |
| Very good |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
0 |
| Good |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
5 |
| Fair |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
11 |
| Mediocre |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
0 |
| Poor |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
0 |
| Not reported |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| Urban collector (total reported) |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
8 |
| Very good |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
0 |
| Good |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
1 |
| Fair |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
6 |
| Mediocre |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
1 |
| Poor |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
0 |
| Not reported |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
KEY: N = data do not exist.
NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting
road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the
International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only
available using the Present Serviceability Rating.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured
pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is
a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition
would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking,
and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual
editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
