 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Ohio: 2000
Excel |
CSV |
Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
742 |
392 |
1,975 |
2,190 |
967 |
| Very good |
176 |
49 |
70 |
125 |
68 |
| Good |
403 |
174 |
521 |
615 |
257 |
| Fair |
115 |
159 |
1,046 |
1,231 |
600 |
| Mediocre |
38 |
8 |
225 |
138 |
1 |
| Poor |
10 |
2 |
113 |
81 |
41 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
24 |
13 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
| Good |
54 |
44 |
26 |
28 |
27 |
| Fair |
15 |
41 |
53 |
56 |
62 |
| Mediocre |
5 |
2 |
11 |
6 |
0 |
| Poor |
1 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
NOTE:
Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE:
Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the
International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface
condition. A comprehensive measure of
pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as
rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64,
available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
