 |
 |
 |
 |
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Oklahoma: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
209 |
138 |
798 |
1,712 |
855 |
| Very good |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
55 |
48 |
64 |
43 |
6 |
| Fair |
49 |
70 |
362 |
648 |
116 |
| Mediocre |
60 |
17 |
203 |
499 |
158 |
| Poor |
42 |
3 |
169 |
522 |
575 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
26 |
35 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
| Fair |
23 |
51 |
45 |
38 |
14 |
| Mediocre |
29 |
12 |
25 |
29 |
18 |
| Poor |
20 |
2 |
21 |
30 |
67 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness
using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition.
A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement
distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions,
tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |