 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Utah: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
167 |
9 |
267 |
325 |
46 |
| Very good |
16 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
| Good |
58 |
6 |
87 |
69 |
3 |
| Fair |
41 |
2 |
148 |
183 |
17 |
| Mediocre |
44 |
0 |
19 |
54 |
12 |
| Poor |
8 |
0 |
8 |
13 |
14 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
10 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
| Good |
35 |
67 |
33 |
21 |
7 |
| Fair |
25 |
22 |
55 |
56 |
37 |
| Mediocre |
26 |
0 |
7 |
17 |
26 |
| Poor |
5 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
30 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to
rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the
International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface
condition. A comprehensive measure of
pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as
rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
