 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions
in Alabama: 2000
Excel |
CSV |
Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
600 |
2,083 |
3,691 |
700 |
| Very good |
229 |
522 |
499 |
44 |
| Good |
258 |
1,181 |
2,079 |
245 |
| Fair |
73 |
369 |
1,113 |
163 |
| Mediocre |
37 |
11 |
0 |
248 |
| Poor |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
38 |
25 |
14 |
6 |
| Good |
43 |
57 |
56 |
35 |
| Fair |
12 |
18 |
30 |
23 |
| Mediocre |
6 |
1 |
0 |
35 |
| Poor |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
