 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Connecticut: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
100 |
263 |
495 |
1,156 |
| Very good |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
80 |
71 |
51 |
26 |
| Fair |
13 |
178 |
418 |
792 |
| Mediocre |
5 |
12 |
26 |
211 |
| Poor |
1 |
2 |
0 |
127 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
80 |
27 |
10 |
2 |
| Fair |
13 |
68 |
84 |
69 |
| Mediocre |
5 |
5 |
5 |
18 |
| Poor |
1 |
1 |
0 |
11 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
