 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Georgia: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
808 |
2,798 |
5,602 |
773 |
| Very good |
557 |
2,089 |
4,301 |
726 |
| Good |
211 |
665 |
1,274 |
47 |
| Fair |
36 |
44 |
27 |
0 |
| Mediocre |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
69 |
75 |
77 |
94 |
| Good |
26 |
24 |
23 |
6 |
| Fair |
4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
| Mediocre |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
