Table 1-6: Indiana Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban,,,,,, (Miles),,,,,, ,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000 Interstate (total reported),313,317,316,318,317,318 Very good ,22,23,25,63,72,72 Good,93,100,116,150,165,165 Fair,96,84,79,61,53,53 Mediocre ,58,67,56,31,21,22 Poor,44,43,40,13,6,6 Not reported,6,2,2,0,0,0 Other freeways and expressways (total reported),115,126,127,128,130,144 Very good ,8,8,6,11,16,16 Good,22,23,28,26,22,22 Fair,59,68,69,66,69,69 Mediocre ,23,25,22,19,14,14 Poor,3,2,2,6,9,23 Not reported,17,6,6,7,7,7 Other principal arterial (total reported),"1,040","1,089","1,099","1,101","1,093","1,094" Very good ,12,13,11,36,50,50 Good,109,125,145,220,250,250 Fair,541,563,579,579,570,571 Mediocre ,226,231,229,166,137,137 Poor,152,157,135,100,86,86 Not reported,508,462,452,446,442,443 Urban minor arterial (total reported),N,N,N,N,N,315 Very good ,N,N,N,N,N,0 Good,N,N,N,N,N,157 Fair,N,N,N,N,N,93 Mediocre ,N,N,N,N,N,29 Poor,N,N,N,N,N,36 Not reported,N,N,N,N,N,N Urban collector (total reported),N,N,N,N,N,N Very good ,N,N,N,N,N,N Good,N,N,N,N,N,N Fair,N,N,N,N,N,N Mediocre ,N,N,N,N,N,N Poor,N,N,N,N,N,N Not reported,N,N,N,N,N,N KEY: N = data do not exist.,,,,,, "NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.",,,,,, "NOTE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting. ",,,,,, "SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.",,,,,,