Table 1-6: Louisiana Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban,,,,,, (Miles),,,,,, ,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000 Interstate (total reported),270,282,282,259,223,231 Very good ,69,6,1,0,0,1 Good,157,71,62,11,21,73 Fair,21,83,74,73,72,53 Mediocre ,17,102,109,113,87,80 Poor,6,20,36,62,43,24 Not reported,2,0,0,23,59,51 Other freeways and expressways (total reported),45,45,44,45,33,35 Very good ,3,0,3,0,0,0 Good,26,3,1,0,4,0 Fair,16,37,20,22,18,21 Mediocre ,0,3,12,17,10,9 Poor,0,2,8,6,1,5 Not reported,0,0,0,1,11,14 Other principal arterial (total reported),846,845,683,712,715,753 Very good ,146,21,23,7,7,11 Good,265,123,107,113,126,124 Fair,417,517,315,267,268,293 Mediocre ,13,129,120,173,161,177 Poor,5,55,118,152,153,148 Not reported,0,0,154,131,139,99 Urban minor arterial (total reported),N,N,N,N,N,"1,528" Very good ,N,N,N,N,N,11 Good,N,N,N,N,N,167 Fair,N,N,N,N,N,536 Mediocre ,N,N,N,N,N,340 Poor,N,N,N,N,N,474 Not reported,N,N,N,N,N,N Urban collector (total reported),N,N,N,N,N,"1,235" Very good ,N,N,N,N,N,0 Good,N,N,N,N,N,84 Fair,N,N,N,N,N,426 Mediocre ,N,N,N,N,N,285 Poor,N,N,N,N,N,440 Not reported,N,N,N,N,N,N KEY: N = data do not exist.,,,,,, "NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.",,,,,, "NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting. ",,,,,, "SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.",,,,,,