 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Louisiana: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
556 |
1,223 |
1,625 |
6,965 |
| Very good |
49 |
49 |
120 |
121 |
| Good |
226 |
418 |
549 |
1,908 |
| Fair |
90 |
600 |
740 |
3,854 |
| Mediocre |
142 |
133 |
146 |
625 |
| Poor |
49 |
23 |
70 |
457 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
9 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
| Good |
41 |
34 |
34 |
27 |
| Fair |
16 |
49 |
46 |
55 |
| Mediocre |
26 |
11 |
9 |
9 |
| Poor |
9 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
