 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in New Jersey: 2000
Excel |
CSV |
Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
120 |
524 |
385 |
57 |
| Very good |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
46 |
65 |
15 |
22 |
| Fair |
45 |
368 |
314 |
35 |
| Mediocre |
20 |
42 |
16 |
0 |
| Poor |
8 |
49 |
40 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
38 |
12 |
4 |
39 |
| Fair |
38 |
70 |
82 |
61 |
| Mediocre |
17 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
| Poor |
7 |
9 |
10 |
0 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
