 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in New Jersey: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
290 |
310 |
1,254 |
589 |
91 |
| Very good |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
54 |
53 |
41 |
41 |
26 |
| Fair |
123 |
222 |
497 |
266 |
54 |
| Mediocre |
92 |
30 |
302 |
105 |
11 |
| Poor |
19 |
5 |
414 |
177 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
19 |
17 |
3 |
7 |
29 |
| Fair |
42 |
72 |
40 |
45 |
59 |
| Mediocre |
32 |
10 |
24 |
18 |
12 |
| Poor |
7 |
2 |
33 |
30 |
0 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
