 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in North Carolina: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
651 |
2,242 |
3,013 |
3,097 |
| Very good |
62 |
73 |
40 |
49 |
| Good |
289 |
1,115 |
833 |
1,092 |
| Fair |
133 |
933 |
1,798 |
1,387 |
| Mediocre |
140 |
100 |
261 |
264 |
| Poor |
27 |
21 |
81 |
305 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
10 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
| Good |
44 |
50 |
28 |
35 |
| Fair |
20 |
42 |
60 |
45 |
| Mediocre |
22 |
4 |
9 |
9 |
| Poor |
4 |
1 |
3 |
10 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
