 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in North Carolina: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
373 |
280 |
1,368 |
684 |
212 |
| Very good |
4 |
5 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
| Good |
191 |
120 |
349 |
193 |
46 |
| Fair |
78 |
123 |
744 |
335 |
88 |
| Mediocre |
71 |
26 |
147 |
83 |
48 |
| Poor |
29 |
6 |
115 |
71 |
30 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
51 |
43 |
26 |
28 |
22 |
| Fair |
21 |
44 |
54 |
49 |
42 |
| Mediocre |
19 |
9 |
11 |
12 |
23 |
| Poor |
8 |
2 |
8 |
10 |
14 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
