 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in North Dakota: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
531 |
2,929 |
2,515 |
2,903 |
| Very good |
142 |
292 |
236 |
107 |
| Good |
294 |
1,387 |
896 |
1,300 |
| Fair |
75 |
1,229 |
1,351 |
1,496 |
| Mediocre |
20 |
21 |
32 |
0 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
27 |
10 |
9 |
4 |
| Good |
55 |
47 |
36 |
45 |
| Fair |
14 |
42 |
54 |
52 |
| Mediocre |
4 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured
pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is
a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition
would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking,
and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual
editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
