 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Ohio: 2000
Excel |
CSV |
Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
830 |
2,232 |
2,830 |
8,942 |
| Very good |
361 |
373 |
140 |
715 |
| Good |
368 |
1,397 |
1,959 |
5,302 |
| Fair |
86 |
443 |
701 |
2,762 |
| Mediocre |
15 |
16 |
30 |
106 |
| Poor |
0 |
3 |
0 |
57 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
43 |
17 |
5 |
8 |
| Good |
44 |
63 |
69 |
59 |
| Fair |
10 |
20 |
25 |
31 |
| Mediocre |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
NOTE:
Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the
International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface
condition. A comprehensive measure of
pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as
rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables
HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
