 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Oregon: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
142 |
51 |
545 |
203 |
36 |
| Very good |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
| Good |
29 |
1 |
32 |
2 |
0 |
| Fair |
70 |
37 |
384 |
124 |
4 |
| Mediocre |
43 |
1 |
92 |
43 |
30 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
37 |
27 |
2 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
| Good |
20 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
| Fair |
49 |
96 |
70 |
61 |
11 |
| Mediocre |
30 |
2 |
17 |
21 |
83 |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
7 |
13 |
6 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
