 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Tennessee: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
735 |
1,683 |
3,342 |
N |
| Very good |
536 |
655 |
46 |
N |
| Good |
190 |
861 |
1,747 |
N |
| Fair |
7 |
163 |
1,369 |
N |
| Mediocre |
2 |
3 |
180 |
N |
| Poor |
0 |
1 |
0 |
N |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
N |
| Very good |
73 |
39 |
1 |
N |
| Good |
26 |
51 |
52 |
N |
| Fair |
1 |
10 |
41 |
N |
| Mediocre |
0 |
0 |
5 |
N |
| Poor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
KEY FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: N = data do not exist.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
