 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Texas: 2000
Excel | CSV
| Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
2,173 |
6,881 |
9,647 |
36,139 |
| Very good |
375 |
410 |
437 |
513 |
| Good |
1,303 |
3,383 |
3,623 |
3,937 |
| Fair |
316 |
2,029 |
3,564 |
23,579 |
| Mediocre |
170 |
930 |
1,670 |
5,777 |
| Poor |
9 |
129 |
353 |
2,333 |
| Not reported |
40 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
17 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
| Good |
60 |
49 |
38 |
11 |
| Fair |
15 |
29 |
37 |
65 |
| Mediocre |
8 |
14 |
17 |
16 |
| Poor |
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement
roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface
condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on
other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions,
tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
