 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Texas: 2000
Excel | CSV
| Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
1,021 |
1,109 |
4,244 |
2,870 |
1,343 |
| Very good |
39 |
42 |
69 |
7 |
0 |
| Good |
403 |
351 |
689 |
339 |
98 |
| Fair |
308 |
333 |
937 |
1,892 |
611 |
| Mediocre |
255 |
323 |
1,354 |
450 |
338 |
| Poor |
16 |
60 |
1,195 |
182 |
296 |
| Not reported |
0 |
92 |
696 |
0 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
4 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
| Good |
39 |
32 |
16 |
12 |
7 |
| Fair |
30 |
30 |
22 |
66 |
45 |
| Mediocre |
25 |
29 |
32 |
16 |
25 |
| Poor |
2 |
5 |
28 |
6 |
22 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement
roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface
condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on
other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions,
tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
