 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Utah: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
770 |
1,004 |
1,535 |
1,890 |
| Very good |
173 |
27 |
65 |
51 |
| Good |
367 |
448 |
349 |
360 |
| Fair |
115 |
512 |
1,104 |
1,280 |
| Mediocre |
104 |
17 |
17 |
167 |
| Poor |
11 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
22 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
| Good |
48 |
45 |
23 |
19 |
| Fair |
15 |
51 |
72 |
68 |
| Mediocre |
14 |
2 |
1 |
9 |
| Poor |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
