 |
|
|
|
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in West Virginia: 2000
Excel | CSV
| Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Total |
455 |
1,081 |
1,534 |
5,970 |
| Very good |
33 |
94 |
55 |
0 |
| Good |
259 |
405 |
387 |
686 |
| Fair |
57 |
540 |
923 |
2,917 |
| Mediocre |
81 |
38 |
113 |
1,378 |
| Poor |
25 |
4 |
56 |
989 |
| Not reported |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(Percent)
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Very good |
7 |
9 |
4 |
0 |
| Good |
57 |
37 |
25 |
11 |
| Fair |
13 |
50 |
60 |
49 |
| Mediocre |
18 |
4 |
7 |
23 |
| Poor |
5 |
0 |
4 |
17 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness
using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition.
A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement
distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables
HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
as of Feb. 1, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
