 |
Table 1-2
Highway Pavement Conditions: 1994-97
| 1994 |
13.0% |
29.9% |
24.2% |
26.7% |
6.2% |
12,338 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
| 1995 |
10.4% |
26.8% |
23.8% |
27.5% |
11.4% |
12,307 |
37.2% |
62.7% |
| 1996 |
8.6% |
28.3% |
24.7% |
30.7% |
7.6% |
12,430 |
36.9% |
63.0% |
| 1997 |
9.0% |
27.0% |
24.4% |
32.9% |
6.7% |
12,477 |
36.0% |
64.0% |
| 1994 |
5.3% |
12.7% |
58.1% |
20.9% |
2.9% |
7,618 |
18.0% |
81.9% |
| 1995 |
4.8% |
9.8% |
54.7% |
20.4% |
10.3% |
7,804 |
14.6% |
85.4% |
| 1996 |
3.4% |
8.7% |
54.7% |
26.3% |
6.8% |
8,410 |
12.1% |
87.8% |
| 1997 |
12.0% |
34.2% |
24.3% |
25.2% |
4.2% |
8,480 |
12.0% |
88.0% |
| 1994 |
12.5% |
16.3% |
50.8% |
16.6% |
3.8% |
38,598 |
28.7% |
71.2% |
| 1995 |
12.4% |
14.7% |
47.2% |
15.9% |
9.7% |
41,444 |
27.1% |
72.8% |
| 1996 |
11.8% |
14.1% |
48.9% |
17.5% |
7.7% |
44,498 |
25.9% |
74.1% |
| 1997 |
26.7% |
33.0% |
16.5% |
17.8% |
6.0% |
45,009 |
26.7% |
73.3% |
| 1994 |
6.7% |
12.3% |
38.1% |
20.5% |
22.1% |
87,852 |
19.0% |
80.7% |
| 1995 |
6.7% |
13.6% |
36.9% |
20.4% |
22.1% |
88,510 |
20.3% |
79.4% |
| 1996 |
6.9% |
13.0% |
37.9% |
20.7% |
21.1% |
89,020 |
19.9% |
79.7% |
| 1997 |
7.2% |
13.0% |
37.9% |
21.4% |
20.6% |
88,484 |
20.2% |
79.8% |
| 1994 |
9.8% |
16.2% |
40.0% |
17.0% |
16.0% |
86,098 |
26.0% |
73.0% |
| 1995 |
9.7% |
16.8% |
39.0% |
17.2% |
16.6% |
87,331 |
26.5% |
72.8% |
| 1996 |
9.7% |
16.6% |
39.2% |
18.2% |
15.4% |
87,790 |
26.3% |
72.8% |
| 1997 |
10.6% |
16.0% |
39.0% |
18.4% |
15.9% |
86,666 |
26.6% |
73.4% |
| 1994 |
9.1% |
15.4% |
40.8% |
18.9% |
15.3% |
232,504 |
24.4% |
75.1% |
| 1995 |
8.9% |
15.5% |
39.4% |
18.8% |
17.0% |
237,396 |
24.5% |
75.2% |
| 1996 |
8.8% |
15.1% |
40.3% |
19.9% |
15.4% |
242,148 |
23.9% |
75.6% |
| 1997 |
9.3% |
15.0% |
40.5% |
20.4% |
14.9% |
241,116 |
24.3% |
75.8% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1994 |
6.5% |
26.5% |
23.9% |
33.2% |
9.9% |
31,502 |
33.0% |
67.0% |
| 1995 |
6.2% |
20.7% |
22.3% |
36.9% |
13.9% |
31,254 |
26.9% |
73.1% |
| 1996 |
3.9% |
19.1% |
21.7% |
38.8% |
16.6% |
31,312 |
23.3% |
76.6% |
| 1997 |
3.6% |
19.1% |
20.7% |
41.0% |
15.7% |
31,431 |
22.7% |
77.3% |
| 1994 |
2.4% |
8.2% |
57.4% |
26.6% |
5.4% |
89,506 |
10.6% |
89.4% |
| 1995 |
4.4% |
7.6% |
51.1% |
27.9% |
9.0% |
89,265 |
12.0% |
88.0% |
| 1996 |
1.4% |
5.8% |
49.1% |
34.4% |
9.3% |
92,103 |
7.4% |
92.6% |
| 1997 |
1.6% |
4.9% |
47.7% |
37.2% |
8.6% |
92,170 |
6.5% |
93.5% |
| 1994 |
3.5% |
10.5% |
57.9% |
23.6% |
4.5% |
124,877 |
14.0% |
86.0% |
| 1995 |
3.7% |
9.0% |
54.7% |
23.9% |
8.7% |
121,443 |
12.7% |
87.3% |
| 1996 |
2.3% |
8.2% |
50.7% |
31.0% |
7.7% |
126,381 |
10.6% |
89.4% |
| 1997 |
2.3% |
6.7% |
50.4% |
33.6% |
7.0% |
126,525 |
9.0% |
91.0% |
| 1994 |
6.5% |
11.3% |
33.5% |
16.1% |
21.9% |
431,111 |
17.8% |
71.5% |
| 1995 |
6.5% |
11.4% |
30.8% |
17.4% |
23.7% |
431,712 |
17.9% |
71.9% |
| 1996 |
6.7% |
10.3% |
34.4% |
20.0% |
18.4% |
432,117 |
19.8% |
70.1% |
| 1997 |
7.8% |
12.3% |
37.6% |
23.0% |
19.3% |
386,122 |
20.1% |
79.9% |
| 1994 |
5.4% |
11.4% |
40.7% |
19.7% |
16.0% |
676,996 |
16.9% |
76.3% |
| 1995 |
5.7% |
10.4% |
38.1% |
20.1% |
18.8% |
643,749 |
16.1% |
77.0% |
| 1996 |
5.0% |
9.7% |
38.8% |
24.8% |
14.8% |
681,913 |
14.7% |
78.4% |
| 1997 |
5.6% |
10.4% |
40.8% |
28.1% |
15.1% |
636,248 |
16.0% |
84.0% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1994 |
6.3% |
12.4% |
40.7% |
19.5% |
15.8% |
909,500 |
18.8% |
76.0% |
| 1995 |
6.6% |
11.8% |
38.4% |
19.8% |
18.3% |
881,145 |
18.4% |
76.5% |
| 1996 |
6.0% |
11.2% |
39.2% |
23.5% |
15.2% |
924,061 |
17.2% |
79.2% |
| 1997 |
6.6% |
11.7% |
40.7% |
26.0% |
15.0% |
877,364 |
18.3% |
81.7% |
NOTES: Numbers may not total due to rounding. Condition for rural
and urban Interstates and other principal arterials, urban other freeways and
expressways, and rural minor arterials based on International Roughness Index
data from the Federal Highway Administration. Condition for urban minor
arterials and collectors and rural major collectors based on Present
Serviceability Rating data from the Federal Highway Administration.
KEY:Poor= needs immediate improvement.Mediocre= needs
improvement in the near future to preserve usability.Fair= will likely
need improvement in the near future, but depends on traffic use.Good= in
good condition; will not require improvement in the near future.Very
good= new or almost new pavement; will not require improvement for some
time.
SOURCES: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, Highway Statistics (Washington, DC: Annual editions),
tables HM-63 and HM-64. U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of
Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Statistics 1999
(Washington, DC: Forthcoming).
|
|
