Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 8.7 | – | 22.1 | – | 10.0 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 39.5 | 0.9 | S | S | S | S |
| Maine | 29.4 | 0.2 | 41.1 | – | 43.8 | 0.4 |
| Massachusetts | 32.9 | 0.7 | 25.7 | 0.1 | 27.7 | 0.5 |
| New Hampshire | 33.1 | – | 38.9 | – | 40.3 | 0.2 |
| RhodeIsland | S | S | 35.2 | – | 38.1 | 0.2 |
| Vermont | 48.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 18.8 | 2.0 | 15.7 | 2.3 | 16.4 | 1.2 |
| New York | 16.5 | 0.8 | 12.4 | 0.6 | 9.5 | 0.3 |
| Pennsylvania | 9.3 | 1.1 | 18.2 | 3.0 | 17.8 | 1.5 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 24.6 | 0.5 | 23.9 | 0.2 | 22.8 | 0.7 |
| Indiana | 34.0 | 0.3 | 23.0 | – | 23.7 | 0.2 |
| Michigan | 32.0 | 0.5 | 20.4 | 0.3 | 19.4 | 0.4 |
| Ohio | 48.2 | 2.5 | 18.2 | 0.3 | 19.9 | 0.3 |
| Wisconsin | 28.3 | 0.4 | S | S | S | S |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | S | S | 45.8 | – | 48.2 | 0.3 |
| Kansas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Minnesota | 39.1 | 0.1 | 37.9 | – | 38.1 | 0.1 |
| Missouri | 38.7 | 0.3 | 45.3 | 0.5 | 44.3 | 1.3 |
| Nebraska | 44.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| North Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | S | S | 44.4 | – | 44.6 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 21.5 | 5.0 | 33.5 | 7.5 | 27.3 | 1.3 |
| District of Columbia | 41.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 23.1 | 0.3 | 33.2 | 0.2 | 31.0 | 0.9 |
| Georgia | 26.1 | 0.4 | 35.0 | 0.2 | 35.8 | 0.9 |
| Maryland | 11.7 | 0.8 | 22.3 | 1.4 | 20.4 | 0.4 |
| North Carolina | 30.8 | 0.3 | 25.1 | 0.3 | 20.7 | 0.2 |
| South Carolina | 38.8 | 0.3 | 31.7 | – | 30.2 | 0.4 |
| Virginia | 21.1 | 0.6 | 23.0 | 0.7 | 21.7 | 0.8 |
| West Virginia | 28.5 | – | 38.8 | – | 45.1 | 0.2 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 32.8 | 0.2 | 35.4 | 0.2 | 36.2 | 0.5 |
| Kentucky | 31.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Mississippi | S | S | 43.2 | 0.3 | 42.1 | 0.9 |
| Tennessee | 43.1 | 0.6 | 21.6 | – | 24.6 | – |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 40.9 | 0.2 | 45.6 | – | 45.9 | 0.1 |
| Louisiana | 39.9 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Oklahoma | 48.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Texas | 27.5 | 0.5 | 25.5 | 0.3 | 25.3 | 1.2 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | S | S | 27.6 | – | 28.6 | 0.3 |
| Colorado | 38.6 | – | 43.9 | – | 44.0 | – |
| Idaho | 45.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | 39.1 | – | 45.9 | – | 45.6 | 0.2 |
| Nevada | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | 23.0 | – | 25.4 | – |
| California | 34.1 | 1.4 | 21.2 | 0.3 | 21.1 | 2.0 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 49.7 | 0.2 | 29.9 | – | 30.4 | 0.5 |
| Washington | 39.4 | 0.2 | 32.9 | – | 33.7 | 0.7 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.