Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 3.6 | – | 12.4 | – | 7.1 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 9.0 | – | 16.5 | – | 15.9 | – |
| Maine | 21.2 | – | 33.4 | – | 34.6 | 0.2 |
| Massachusetts | 21.8 | 0.1 | 20.5 | – | 19.6 | 0.2 |
| New Hampshire | 24.3 | – | 26.3 | – | 27.1 | – |
| RhodeIsland | 42.1 | – | 31.4 | – | 33.2 | – |
| Vermont | 28.0 | – | 46.8 | – | 45.3 | – |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 16.5 | 0.3 | 13.7 | – | 14.2 | 0.2 |
| New York | 14.9 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Pennsylvania | 19.7 | 0.3 | 20.7 | 0.2 | 23.9 | 1.0 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 11.5 | 0.2 | 16.9 | – | 16.6 | 0.3 |
| Indiana | 22.4 | 0.2 | 14.6 | – | 18.6 | 0.2 |
| Michigan | 13.2 | 0.2 | 9.7 | – | 11.6 | 0.3 |
| Ohio | 18.7 | 0.5 | 12.6 | 0.2 | 11.9 | 0.4 |
| Wisconsin | 18.5 | 0.1 | 19.1 | – | 19.3 | 0.4 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 21.4 | – | 25.3 | – | 26.7 | 0.1 |
| Kansas | 13.5 | – | 20.5 | – | 22.9 | – |
| Minnesota | 25.9 | 0.2 | 29.3 | 0.2 | 25.1 | 0.7 |
| Missouri | 12.0 | 0.1 | 26.9 | – | 23.9 | 0.2 |
| Nebraska | 23.2 | – | S | S | 44.9 | 0.2 |
| North Dakota | 34.5 | – | 24.4 | – | 25.5 | – |
| South Dakota | 43.4 | – | 38.7 | – | 34.8 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | S | S | 33.3 | – | 31.3 | – |
| District of Columbia | 34.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 8.5 | 1.1 | 16.7 | 0.9 | 20.4 | 1.8 |
| Georgia | 7.2 | 2.3 | 16.9 | 3.5 | 15.3 | 2.4 |
| Maryland | 10.0 | 0.1 | 34.0 | – | 34.4 | 0.3 |
| North Carolina | 16.2 | 0.8 | 19.2 | 0.6 | 19.3 | 0.7 |
| South Carolina | 9.0 | 0.3 | 15.1 | 0.7 | 14.1 | 0.4 |
| Virginia | 10.6 | 0.2 | 36.3 | 0.2 | 40.2 | 0.7 |
| West Virginia | 26.5 | 0.1 | 38.7 | – | 38.4 | 0.2 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 11.1 | 0.3 | 14.0 | 0.7 | 16.3 | 0.8 |
| Kentucky | 21.7 | 0.2 | 22.6 | 0.2 | 27.9 | 0.6 |
| Mississippi | 14.6 | 0.2 | 17.0 | – | 14.8 | 0.1 |
| Tennessee | 15.2 | 0.6 | 9.8 | 0.4 | 13.9 | 0.5 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 22.8 | 0.1 | 27.2 | – | 28.0 | 0.2 |
| Louisiana | 49.6 | 0.7 | 30.1 | – | 31.7 | 0.4 |
| Oklahoma | 22.4 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Texas | 7.6 | 0.3 | 11.1 | 0.3 | 9.9 | 0.8 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | S | S | 35.7 | – | 37.2 | 0.2 |
| Colorado | 22.7 | – | 37.0 | – | 36.3 | 0.4 |
| Idaho | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | 31.4 | – | 42.9 | – | 43.8 | – |
| Nevada | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | 22.3 | – | 48.0 | – | S | S |
| Utah | 29.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Wyoming | 37.5 | – | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 41.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| California | 17.5 | 0.5 | 10.5 | 0.1 | 11.1 | 1.0 |
| Hawaii | S | S | 45.5 | – | 48.5 | – |
| Oregon | 17.0 | – | 18.8 | – | 19.2 | 0.2 |
| Washington | 15.0 | – | 20.1 | – | 20.5 | 0.2 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.