Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 5.8 | – | 14.0 | – | 11.7 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 26.5 | 0.7 | 24.1 | 0.3 | 25.7 | 0.3 |
| Maine | 10.6 | 2.5 | 16.2 | 3.5 | 14.5 | 1.3 |
| Massachusetts | 24.0 | 2.9 | 22.4 | 0.9 | 18.5 | 0.7 |
| New Hampshire | 23.0 | 1.4 | 16.1 | 0.9 | 16.0 | 0.3 |
| RhodeIsland | 30.0 | 0.1 | 39.8 | 0.2 | S | S |
| Vermont | 26.5 | 0.6 | 28.0 | 0.6 | 25.6 | 0.2 |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 12.4 | 0.4 | S | S | 49.1 | 1.8 |
| New York | 29.8 | 2.4 | 28.1 | 0.7 | 25.2 | 1.0 |
| Pennsylvania | 17.2 | 0.8 | 21.4 | 0.7 | 19.1 | 1.0 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 16.8 | 0.6 | 20.1 | 0.7 | 17.4 | 1.2 |
| Indiana | 25.2 | 0.3 | 35.0 | 0.3 | 35.4 | 0.7 |
| Michigan | 19.4 | 0.2 | 24.2 | – | 23.0 | 0.2 |
| Ohio | 14.2 | 0.2 | 18.9 | 0.2 | 17.3 | 0.4 |
| Wisconsin | 22.9 | 0.3 | 23.6 | 0.6 | 26.6 | 2.0 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 34.0 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Kansas | 36.1 | – | 41.7 | – | 42.2 | 0.3 |
| Minnesota | 17.4 | 0.1 | 25.2 | – | 23.5 | 0.4 |
| Missouri | 32.6 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Nebraska | 41.7 | – | S | S | S | S |
| North Dakota | 32.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 36.8 | – | S | S | S | S |
| District of Columbia | 33.2 | – | 47.7 | – | 45.2 | – |
| Florida | 23.8 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Georgia | 19.2 | 0.2 | 17.6 | 0.1 | 18.0 | 0.5 |
| Maryland | 21.0 | 0.2 | 39.9 | 0.2 | 34.2 | 0.5 |
| North Carolina | 26.0 | 0.4 | S | S | S | S |
| South Carolina | 39.7 | 0.7 | 29.9 | 0.2 | 31.7 | 0.4 |
| Virginia | 19.0 | 0.2 | 41.8 | 0.3 | 41.4 | 0.8 |
| West Virginia | 44.3 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 33.2 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Kentucky | 15.5 | 0.2 | 17.0 | 0.3 | 16.4 | 0.8 |
| Mississippi | 26.8 | – | 33.6 | – | 34.1 | 0.2 |
| Tennessee | 30.1 | 0.3 | 32.9 | 0.4 | 34.3 | 1.1 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Louisiana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oklahoma | 34.4 | – | 41.3 | – | 41.3 | – |
| Texas | 25.4 | 0.3 | 24.5 | – | 23.2 | 0.4 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 24.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Colorado | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Idaho | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 39.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | 48.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 37.8 | – | 43.6 | – | 49.1 | – |
| California | 14.2 | 0.3 | 16.6 | 0.2 | 16.5 | 1.4 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 36.4 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Washington | 27.0 | 0.1 | 38.5 | – | 38.3 | 0.2 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.