Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 6.1 | – | 21.7 | – | 8.0 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 27.4 | 0.1 | 32.7 | – | 32.2 | – |
| Maine | 37.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Massachusetts | 19.7 | – | 24.1 | – | 25.1 | – |
| New Hampshire | 30.3 | – | 30.7 | – | 31.7 | – |
| RhodeIsland | 43.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 11.1 | 0.2 | 38.1 | – | 45.8 | 0.3 |
| New York | 9.6 | 0.2 | 35.2 | 0.2 | 34.3 | 0.3 |
| Pennsylvania | 16.4 | 0.3 | 36.7 | 1.2 | 40.3 | 2.9 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 12.8 | 0.6 | 29.3 | 1.3 | 28.4 | 1.6 |
| Indiana | 14.4 | 0.2 | 29.0 | 1.9 | 29.5 | 3.2 |
| Michigan | 9.6 | 0.3 | 34.2 | 0.6 | 36.9 | 1.0 |
| Ohio | 18.6 | 0.5 | 26.2 | 2.1 | 27.9 | 2.8 |
| Wisconsin | 19.0 | 0.9 | 24.6 | 1.1 | 23.4 | 0.3 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 14.9 | 0.3 | 32.5 | 0.7 | 29.1 | 0.3 |
| Kansas | 17.3 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Minnesota | 11.3 | 2.7 | 37.7 | 5.5 | 25.9 | 1.2 |
| Missouri | 40.5 | 1.0 | 39.8 | 0.2 | 41.9 | 0.2 |
| Nebraska | 20.7 | 0.2 | 45.8 | 0.5 | 44.8 | 0.3 |
| North Dakota | 16.0 | 0.3 | 32.7 | 0.8 | 21.9 | 0.2 |
| South Dakota | 11.2 | 0.1 | 47.7 | 0.2 | 34.0 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 35.3 | – | 35.2 | – | 36.7 | – |
| District of Columbia | 41.5 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 11.4 | 0.3 | 35.8 | – | 36.9 | 0.3 |
| Georgia | 22.7 | 0.2 | 21.8 | – | 21.9 | 0.1 |
| Maryland | 15.2 | – | 33.9 | – | 39.8 | – |
| North Carolina | 25.4 | 0.2 | 33.5 | – | 33.4 | 0.1 |
| South Carolina | 19.2 | 0.1 | 29.3 | – | 28.9 | – |
| Virginia | 23.1 | 0.2 | S | S | 49.4 | 0.3 |
| West Virginia | 41.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 21.3 | – | 39.4 | 0.5 | 38.7 | 1.1 |
| Kentucky | 20.9 | 0.2 | 32.4 | 0.4 | 33.1 | 0.6 |
| Mississippi | 25.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Tennessee | 19.2 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 20.2 | – | 39.5 | – | 39.2 | 0.1 |
| Louisiana | 13.8 | 0.2 | 20.8 | 1.9 | 21.2 | 4.4 |
| Oklahoma | 13.5 | – | 26.4 | – | 26.5 | – |
| Texas | 13.8 | 0.5 | 42.8 | 0.3 | 44.2 | 0.8 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 17.4 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Colorado | 24.0 | 0.2 | 23.5 | – | 22.7 | – |
| Idaho | 30.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | 26.5 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 27.0 | – | 23.3 | – | 24.0 | – |
| New Mexico | 41.3 | 0.1 | 39.6 | – | 38.7 | – |
| Utah | 12.7 | – | 19.8 | – | 19.8 | – |
| Wyoming | 30.7 | – | 33.4 | – | 28.8 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 25.5 | – | 33.8 | – | 41.9 | – |
| California | 12.5 | 0.6 | 42.0 | 0.5 | 40.1 | 2.0 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 21.0 | 0.1 | 19.9 | – | 20.1 | – |
| Washington | 13.2 | 0.1 | 28.8 | 0.6 | 30.3 | 1.6 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.