Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 13.3 | – | 10.4 | – | 16.3 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 28.7 | – | 29.5 | – | 29.5 | – |
| Maine | 38.8 | – | 38.8 | – | 39.8 | 0.1 |
| Massachusetts | 21.3 | 0.2 | 19.9 | – | 20.8 | 0.1 |
| New Hampshire | 32.3 | – | 39.5 | – | 37.0 | – |
| RhodeIsland | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | S | S | 18.8 | 0.1 | 18.0 | 0.4 |
| New York | 31.6 | 0.3 | 19.3 | – | 20.4 | 0.3 |
| Pennsylvania | 21.0 | 0.3 | 12.9 | – | 13.1 | 0.4 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 22.4 | 0.5 | 26.7 | 0.5 | 26.9 | 0.8 |
| Indiana | 18.3 | – | 21.9 | 0.2 | 20.8 | 0.3 |
| Michigan | 16.4 | 0.2 | 9.4 | – | 10.6 | 0.4 |
| Ohio | 30.8 | 0.4 | 37.2 | 0.6 | 39.5 | 1.3 |
| Wisconsin | 16.1 | 0.1 | 19.9 | – | 20.2 | 0.2 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 25.3 | – | 46.6 | 0.2 | 48.5 | 0.4 |
| Kansas | 32.0 | 0.2 | 38.2 | 0.1 | 41.6 | 0.1 |
| Minnesota | 40.5 | 0.5 | 35.1 | – | 36.5 | 0.4 |
| Missouri | 33.3 | 1.1 | 15.8 | 0.2 | 16.7 | 0.2 |
| Nebraska | 20.9 | – | 34.6 | – | 34.1 | 0.3 |
| North Dakota | 34.4 | – | 29.0 | – | 29.9 | – |
| South Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | S | S | 48.9 | – | 49.9 | – |
| District of Columbia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 15.9 | 0.6 | 41.2 | 1.9 | 45.2 | 3.9 |
| Georgia | 13.9 | 0.3 | 24.8 | 0.6 | 24.1 | 0.4 |
| Maryland | 35.2 | 0.2 | 23.9 | – | 24.2 | 0.3 |
| North Carolina | 17.6 | 0.3 | 22.4 | 0.2 | 22.5 | 0.4 |
| South Carolina | 24.9 | 0.2 | 21.9 | 0.1 | 19.3 | 0.3 |
| Virginia | S | S | 18.4 | – | 19.6 | 0.3 |
| West Virginia | 33.2 | – | 44.6 | – | S | S |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 11.4 | 0.8 | 18.0 | 1.1 | 16.7 | 0.6 |
| Kentucky | 36.9 | 0.2 | 21.2 | 0.2 | 28.2 | 0.2 |
| Mississippi | 8.4 | 3.1 | 12.4 | 3.8 | 17.7 | 1.7 |
| Tennessee | S | S | 17.8 | 0.6 | 11.4 | 0.4 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 21.7 | 0.8 | 34.2 | 1.6 | 32.6 | 1.1 |
| Louisiana | 14.1 | 1.2 | 25.5 | 1.1 | 28.0 | 1.1 |
| Oklahoma | 20.7 | – | 17.7 | – | 17.0 | 0.1 |
| Texas | 21.1 | 1.0 | 13.1 | 0.4 | 17.1 | 1.2 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 30.0 | 0.1 | 33.7 | – | 34.7 | 0.3 |
| Colorado | 28.1 | – | 22.1 | – | 22.4 | – |
| Idaho | 35.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | 47.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 42.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | 35.2 | – | 40.7 | – | 44.5 | – |
| Utah | 24.8 | – | 24.0 | – | 23.8 | 0.2 |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 21.0 | 0.8 | 49.3 | 2.9 | S | S |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 30.8 | 0.1 | 27.0 | – | 27.3 | 0.2 |
| Washington | 49.6 | 0.2 | 32.5 | – | 32.9 | 0.5 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.