Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 4.7 | – | 9.4 | – | 17.1 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 8.5 | 0.2 | 19.3 | 0.3 | 21.3 | 0.3 |
| Maine | S | S | 23.6 | 0.1 | 21.9 | 0.3 |
| Massachusetts | 17.8 | 0.4 | 16.8 | 0.2 | 16.9 | 0.3 |
| New Hampshire | 23.6 | 0.2 | 23.1 | – | 24.3 | 0.1 |
| RhodeIsland | 15.6 | – | 26.4 | – | 28.2 | – |
| Vermont | 24.6 | 0.1 | 41.3 | 0.3 | 33.1 | 0.1 |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 12.4 | 0.6 | 37.3 | 2.8 | 25.4 | 0.8 |
| New York | 7.3 | 2.2 | 13.1 | 4.2 | 16.3 | 2.5 |
| Pennsylvania | 10.5 | 0.7 | 14.9 | 0.7 | 13.5 | 0.9 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 19.2 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Indiana | 16.3 | 0.1 | 29.1 | 0.2 | 28.6 | 0.3 |
| Michigan | 14.9 | 0.3 | 29.1 | 0.2 | 24.5 | 0.2 |
| Ohio | 20.6 | 1.1 | 26.4 | 0.8 | 25.8 | 1.6 |
| Wisconsin | 24.7 | 0.2 | 27.6 | 0.1 | 30.1 | 0.3 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 30.4 | 0.1 | 45.2 | – | 44.2 | 0.4 |
| Kansas | 40.0 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Minnesota | 31.0 | 0.2 | 18.3 | – | 20.7 | 0.5 |
| Missouri | 19.2 | 0.1 | 42.9 | 0.2 | 45.3 | 0.6 |
| Nebraska | 37.8 | – | S | S | S | S |
| North Dakota | 38.2 | – | 41.5 | – | 43.3 | 0.1 |
| South Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | S | S | 16.7 | – | 18.5 | – |
| District of Columbia | 41.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 27.7 | 1.0 | 46.7 | 0.3 | 45.9 | 0.8 |
| Georgia | 19.4 | 0.3 | 15.4 | – | 14.7 | 0.3 |
| Maryland | 20.0 | 0.3 | 31.6 | 0.2 | 28.3 | 0.2 |
| North Carolina | 19.9 | 0.3 | 41.3 | 0.4 | 37.2 | 1.0 |
| South Carolina | 17.5 | – | 23.2 | – | 24.2 | 0.1 |
| Virginia | 20.9 | 0.4 | 15.8 | 0.1 | 17.5 | 0.3 |
| West Virginia | 27.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 18.8 | – | 41.6 | 0.1 | 41.0 | 0.7 |
| Kentucky | 20.1 | 0.2 | 23.3 | – | 24.1 | 0.3 |
| Mississippi | S | S | 30.8 | – | 34.0 | 0.3 |
| Tennessee | 20.6 | 0.3 | 31.1 | 0.2 | 29.3 | 1.1 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 24.9 | 0.1 | 36.1 | – | 34.8 | – |
| Louisiana | 30.2 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Oklahoma | 15.1 | – | 49.5 | – | S | S |
| Texas | 13.4 | 0.4 | 40.2 | 0.9 | 38.5 | 3.4 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 23.3 | 0.1 | 28.5 | – | 29.1 | 0.3 |
| Colorado | 28.3 | 0.2 | 22.0 | – | 22.4 | 0.2 |
| Idaho | 32.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | 32.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 45.6 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | 27.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | 26.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Wyoming | 42.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | 49.5 | – | 45.4 | – |
| California | 16.1 | 0.7 | 24.2 | 0.1 | 37.7 | 1.9 |
| Hawaii | S | S | 44.3 | – | 44.1 | – |
| Oregon | S | S | 20.4 | – | 19.5 | 0.1 |
| Washington | 24.2 | 0.2 | 22.1 | – | 20.7 | 0.3 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.