Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 5.2 | – | 9.1 | – | 14.0 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 14.5 | – | 15.3 | – | 15.7 | 0.1 |
| Maine | 26.9 | – | 34.9 | – | 38.9 | 0.2 |
| Massachusetts | 23.8 | 0.3 | 23.3 | – | 23.1 | 0.3 |
| New Hampshire | 33.5 | – | 33.5 | – | 34.5 | – |
| RhodeIsland | 32.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | 33.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 18.9 | 0.3 | 15.1 | – | 15.6 | 0.3 |
| New York | 20.4 | 0.3 | 43.9 | 0.5 | S | S |
| Pennsylvania | 12.5 | 0.4 | 19.9 | 0.2 | 19.6 | 0.5 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 7.1 | 0.8 | 29.0 | 2.3 | 22.2 | 1.7 |
| Indiana | 11.3 | 0.3 | 15.0 | 0.2 | 17.6 | 0.3 |
| Michigan | 21.8 | 0.9 | 13.7 | 0.4 | 13.2 | 0.5 |
| Ohio | 10.0 | 0.3 | 28.8 | 1.2 | 31.4 | 2.2 |
| Wisconsin | 5.3 | 1.8 | 12.5 | 3.7 | 14.2 | 1.3 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 11.3 | 0.3 | 26.4 | 0.4 | 29.6 | 0.5 |
| Kansas | 18.4 | 0.1 | 34.1 | 0.2 | 35.3 | 0.7 |
| Minnesota | 11.3 | 0.5 | 19.3 | 0.9 | 25.3 | 0.9 |
| Missouri | 9.6 | 0.2 | 41.0 | 0.3 | 39.7 | 0.2 |
| Nebraska | 13.9 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| North Dakota | 12.1 | – | 16.8 | – | 17.7 | 0.2 |
| South Dakota | 29.3 | 0.1 | 25.1 | – | 27.1 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 25.3 | – | 35.3 | – | 37.5 | – |
| District of Columbia | 34.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 18.4 | 0.3 | 30.0 | 0.2 | 30.2 | 0.9 |
| Georgia | 26.8 | 0.3 | 20.3 | 0.3 | 21.9 | 1.0 |
| Maryland | 14.0 | 0.1 | 22.1 | – | 22.4 | 0.1 |
| North Carolina | 18.0 | 0.2 | 24.6 | 0.2 | 27.4 | 0.5 |
| South Carolina | 11.4 | – | 19.9 | – | 19.1 | 0.1 |
| Virginia | 21.8 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| West Virginia | 29.7 | – | S | S | S | S |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 12.1 | – | 25.1 | 0.1 | 26.8 | 0.4 |
| Kentucky | 18.3 | 0.1 | 36.5 | 0.2 | 29.7 | 0.1 |
| Mississippi | 42.6 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Tennessee | 11.7 | 0.2 | 13.2 | 0.1 | 14.0 | 0.2 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 17.1 | – | 20.5 | – | 20.7 | – |
| Louisiana | 38.9 | 0.4 | S | S | S | S |
| Oklahoma | 17.5 | – | 21.0 | – | 20.6 | – |
| Texas | 17.1 | 0.4 | 15.2 | 0.2 | 15.2 | 1.1 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 36.8 | 0.2 | 49.1 | – | 49.8 | 0.4 |
| Colorado | 22.1 | 0.2 | 21.5 | – | 23.2 | 0.3 |
| Idaho | 23.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | S | S | 24.0 | – | 25.5 | – |
| Nevada | 14.0 | – | 22.6 | – | 23.0 | – |
| New Mexico | 31.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | 29.8 | 0.1 | 19.8 | – | 20.5 | 0.1 |
| Wyoming | 42.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 31.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| California | 11.5 | 0.4 | 11.0 | 0.1 | 10.9 | 1.3 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 36.4 | 0.1 | 24.4 | – | 25.3 | 0.5 |
| Washington | 41.3 | 0.3 | 29.5 | – | 29.7 | 0.6 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.