Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Alabama: 2000
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Alabama: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
Interstate | Other Freeways & Expressways | Other Principal Arterial | Urban Minor Arterial | Urban Collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 305 | 20 | 1,022 | 657 | 35 |
Very good | 86 | 2 | 259 | 127 | 1 |
Good | 115 | 13 | 489 | 219 | 34 |
Fair | 35 | 2 | 261 | 296 | 0 |
Mediocre | 62 | 3 | 10 | 15 | 0 |
Poor | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
(Percent)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Very good | 28 | 10 | 25 | 19 | 3 |
Good | 38 | 65 | 48 | 33 | 97 |
Fair | 11 | 10 | 26 | 45 | 0 |
Mediocre | 20 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Poor | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.