Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Minnesota: 2000
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Minnesota: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
Interstate | Other Freeways & Expressways | Other Principal Arterial | Urban Minor Arterial | Urban Collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 231 | 142 | 521 | 2,084 | 1,504 |
Very good | 42 | 21 | 65 | 102 | 13 |
Good | 125 | 63 | 222 | 659 | 223 |
Fair | 45 | 58 | 215 | 971 | 634 |
Mediocre | 19 | 0 | 13 | 230 | 215 |
Poor | 0 | 0 | 6 | 122 | 419 |
Not reported | 0 | 0 | 35 | N | 0 |
(Percent)
Interstate | Other Freeways & Expressways | Other Principal Arterial | Urban Minor Arterial | Urban Collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Very good | 18 | 15 | 12 | 5 | 1 |
Good | 54 | 44 | 43 | 32 | 15 |
Fair | 19 | 41 | 41 | 47 | 42 |
Mediocre | 8 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 14 |
Poor | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 28 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.