Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in New Jersey: 2000
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in New Jersey: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 120 | 524 | 385 | 57 |
| Very good | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Good | 46 | 65 | 15 | 22 |
| Fair | 45 | 368 | 314 | 35 |
| Mediocre | 20 | 42 | 16 | 0 |
| Poor | 8 | 49 | 40 | 0 |
(Percent)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Very good | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Good | 38 | 12 | 4 | 39 |
| Fair | 38 | 70 | 82 | 61 |
| Mediocre | 17 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Poor | 7 | 9 | 10 | 0 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.