Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in New Jersey: 2000
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in New Jersey: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 290 | 310 | 1,254 | 589 | 91 |
Very good | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Good | 54 | 53 | 41 | 41 | 26 |
Fair | 123 | 222 | 497 | 266 | 54 |
Mediocre | 92 | 30 | 302 | 105 | 11 |
Poor | 19 | 5 | 414 | 177 | 0 |
(Percent)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Very good | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Good | 19 | 17 | 3 | 7 | 29 |
Fair | 42 | 72 | 40 | 45 | 59 |
Mediocre | 32 | 10 | 24 | 18 | 12 |
Poor | 7 | 2 | 33 | 30 | 0 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.