Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Tennessee: 2000
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Tennessee: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 332 | 117 | 1,041 | 43 | 8 |
Very good | 132 | 14 | 143 | 8 | 0 |
Good | 132 | 67 | 429 | 32 | 0 |
Fair | 39 | 31 | 395 | 3 | 8 |
Mediocre | 23 | 4 | 52 | 0 | 0 |
Poor | 6 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
(Percent)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Very good | 40 | 12 | 14 | 19 | 0 |
Good | 40 | 57 | 41 | 74 | 0 |
Fair | 12 | 26 | 38 | 7 | 100 |
Mediocre | 7 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Poor | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.