Table 4. ORNL Comparison of PMT and VMT Estimates
Return to all tables and figures in the Bureau of Transportation Statistics’ 2009 Local Area Transportation Characteristics by Household methodology
Person Miles of Travel per Household (PT)
Add-On Areas | Baseline Standards | Std Err % | % Difference from Baseline | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Div & MSA Size-based | MSA Size-based | CENSUS Division-based | CENSUS Region-based | Regression-based | |||
New York | 67.96 | 2.41% | 6.36% | 314.00% | 8.14% | 12.71% | -3.38% |
Wisconsin | 87.99 | 2.52% | 6.82% | 9.95% | 3.23% | 5.80% | -6.99% |
Texas | 100.12 | 3.89% | 4.99% | -5.05% | 6.63% | 6.55% | -17.30% |
Baltimore | 75.71 | 2.70% | 14.82% | 8.02% | 30.01% | 32.59% | -3.61% |
Lancaster | 79.93 | 5.35% | 8.93% | 20.86% | -4.48% | -1.77% | 5.71% |
Des Moines | 71.69 | 9.94% | 25.82% | 29.97% | 38.05% | 29.25% | 11.86% |
Kentucky | 99.46 | 5.79% | 7.93% | 4.13% | 7.68% | 0.16% | -4.50% |
Hawaii | 68.04 | 7.36% | 66.85% | 79.17% | 39.68% | 43.77% | 33.31% |
Oahu | 68.44 | 7.20% | 68.03% | 46.00% | 42.29% | 46.52% | -0.78% |
Mean Absolute Deviation | 22.39% | 26.06% | 20.02% | 19.90% | 9.72% | ||
Number of "Wins" | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
Vehicle Miles of Travel per Household (VT)
Add-On Areas | Baseline Standards | Std Err % | % Difference from Baseline | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Div & MSA Size-based | MSA Size-based | CENSUS Division-based | CENSUS Region-based | Regression-based | |||
New York | 38.78 | 2.54% | 15.00% | 51.48% | 17.17% | 26.03% | 0.42% |
Wisconsin | 60.85 | 2.76% | 4.74% | 5.02% | 1.10% | 1.64% | -12.76% |
Texas | 68.12 | 4.44% | 4.78% | -9.43% | 6.62% | 4.34% | -20.90% |
Baltimore | 52.88 | 2.93% | 3.54% | 1.08% | 23.61% | 27.30% | -9.41% |
Lancaster | 52.05 | 4.43% | 8.44% | 19.09% | -10.84% | -4.61% | 5.31% |
Des Moines | 48.28 | 8.98% | 19.12% | 24.93% | 30.64% | 27.62% | 12.21% |
Kentucky | 66.93 | 6.22% | 9.25% | 1.06% | 7.56% | 80.00% | -4.85% |
Hawaii | 44.49 | 4.14% | 32.67% | 74.73% | 36.27% | 41.76% | 20.79% |
Oahu | 41.10 | 3.40% | 57.62% | 66.55% | 50.26% | 56.33% | -1.09% |
Mean Absolute Deviation | 17.24% | 28.12% | 20.45% | 21.19% | 9.75% | ||
Number of "Wins" | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Percentage difference in bold indicate the method that gives estimates closest to the baseline
Percentage difference in yellow highlight indicate the cluster-based approach gives estimates closest to the baseline
Source: Hu et al. 2007, Table 12. Comparing Baseline Standards to Various Trip-Frequency Estimates, Data from Nine 2001 NHTS Add-on Areas.