Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 6.0 | – | 9.6 | – | 15.8 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 25.9 | – | S | S | 46.8 | 0.2 |
| Maine | 39.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Massachusetts | 31.2 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| New Hampshire | 28.9 | – | 36.8 | – | 34.7 | – |
| RhodeIsland | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 17.2 | 0.2 | 21.3 | 0.1 | 20.4 | 0.3 |
| New York | 19.7 | 0.3 | 26.3 | 0.1 | 27.0 | 0.3 |
| Pennsylvania | 12.8 | 0.1 | 16.7 | – | 17.1 | 0.3 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 14.4 | 0.2 | 20.5 | 0.1 | 23.7 | 0.3 |
| Indiana | 10.6 | 0.2 | 17.5 | 0.2 | 18.7 | 0.5 |
| Michigan | 21.4 | 0.3 | 32.7 | 0.1 | 28.0 | 0.2 |
| Ohio | 17.2 | 0.3 | 27.0 | 0.3 | 27.7 | 0.8 |
| Wisconsin | 20.1 | 0.1 | 43.6 | 0.3 | 44.4 | 1.6 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | S | S | 32.5 | – | 31.8 | 0.2 |
| Kansas | 22.5 | 0.1 | 33.8 | 0.1 | 35.0 | 0.2 |
| Minnesota | 29.1 | 0.2 | 37.6 | – | 35.8 | 0.3 |
| Missouri | 21.3 | 0.2 | 18.7 | 0.1 | 16.0 | 0.2 |
| Nebraska | 28.9 | – | 37.1 | – | 38.2 | 0.2 |
| North Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | 36.0 | – | 47.6 | – | 47.3 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 47.8 | – | 47.2 | – | 46.8 | – |
| District of Columbia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 15.6 | 0.6 | 26.5 | 1.0 | 33.5 | 1.7 |
| Georgia | 10.1 | 1.1 | 37.8 | 3.2 | 28.4 | 2.6 |
| Maryland | 23.9 | 0.2 | 28.2 | – | 32.0 | 0.5 |
| North Carolina | 14.5 | 0.3 | 12.0 | 0.1 | 13.5 | 0.4 |
| South Carolina | 18.0 | 0.3 | 46.3 | 0.6 | 49.5 | 1.0 |
| Virginia | 37.5 | 0.3 | 17.8 | – | 18.8 | 0.2 |
| West Virginia | 34.0 | – | 36.5 | – | 33.7 | – |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 5.5 | 1.6 | 9.8 | 3.5 | 11.4 | 1.7 |
| Kentucky | 13.7 | 0.2 | 21.0 | 0.1 | 17.8 | 0.3 |
| Mississippi | 27.8 | 1.4 | 24.5 | 0.9 | 17.8 | 0.7 |
| Tennessee | 26.4 | 1.0 | 17.7 | 0.4 | 15.3 | 0.5 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 22.9 | 0.2 | 20.5 | – | 18.7 | 0.1 |
| Louisiana | 21.2 | 0.4 | 33.0 | 0.9 | 47.8 | 2.8 |
| Oklahoma | S | S | 46.6 | 0.1 | 48.0 | 0.4 |
| Texas | 19.8 | 0.7 | 39.4 | 1.0 | 46.5 | 2.3 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 31.2 | – | 18.3 | – | 18.5 | – |
| Colorado | 35.6 | 0.5 | 25.3 | – | 26.6 | 0.2 |
| Idaho | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 16.5 | – | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | 24.4 | – | 39.4 | – | 44.2 | – |
| Utah | 37.2 | – | 42.2 | – | 40.8 | 0.2 |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 20.7 | 0.8 | 35.4 | 0.6 | 38.2 | 3.4 |
| Hawaii | 42.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 42.5 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Washington | 42.8 | 0.2 | 43.4 | – | 43.4 | 0.3 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.