Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 11.9 | – | 34.5 | – | 23.4 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Maine | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Massachusetts | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| New Hampshire | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| RhodeIsland | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| New York | 46.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Pennsylvania | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Indiana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Michigan | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Ohio | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Wisconsin | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Kansas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Minnesota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Missouri | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nebraska | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| North Dakota | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| South Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| District of Columbia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Georgia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Maryland | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| North Carolina | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| South Carolina | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Virginia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| West Virginia | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Kentucky | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Mississippi | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Tennessee | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Louisiana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oklahoma | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Texas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Colorado | 39.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Idaho | S | S | S | S | 47.0 | – |
| Montana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 14.1 | 2.7 | 35.8 | 2.1 | 25.8 | 9.8 |
| California | 44.6 | 0.4 | S | S | S | S |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Washington | 18.0 | 2.3 | 40.3 | 0.7 | 39.0 | 5.3 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.